Impact of using text classifiers for standardising maintenance data of wind turbines on reliability calculations

Abstract This study delves into the challenge of efficiently digitalising wind turbine maintenance data, traditionally hindered by non‐standardised formats necessitating manual, expert intervention. Highlighting the discrepancies in past reliability studies based on different key performance indicators (KPIs), the paper underscores the importance of consistent standards, like RDS‐PP, for maintenance data categorisation. Leveraging on established digitalisation workflows, we investigate the efficacy of text classifiers in automating the categorisation process against conventional manual labelling. Results indicate that while classifiers exhibit high performance for specific datasets, their general applicability across diverse wind farms is limited at the present stage. Furthermore, differences in failure rate KPIs derived from manual versus classifier‐processed data reveal uncertainties in both methods. The study suggests that enhanced clarity in maintenance reporting and refined designation systems can lead to more accurate KPIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET Renewable Power Generation
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.13151
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of using text classifiers for standardising maintenance data of wind turbines on reliability calculations

Marc‐Alexander Lutz, Katharina Fischer, Katharina Beckh, Martin Horn et al.
3 citations
IET Renewable Power Generation
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
0.98
article

Impact of using text classifiers for standardising maintenance data of wind turbines on reliability calculations

Marc‐Alexander Lutz, Katharina Fischer, Katharina Beckh, Martin Horn, Julia Walgern, Athanasios Kolios, Neele Hannes
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study delves into the challenge of efficiently digitalising wind turbine maintenance data, traditionally hindered by non‐standardised formats necessitating manual, expert intervention. Highlighting the discrepancies in past reliability studies based on different key performance indicators (KPIs), the paper underscores the importance of consistent standards, like RDS‐PP, for maintenance data categorisation. Leveraging on established digitalisation workflows, we investigate the efficacy of text classifiers in automating the categorisation process against conventional manual labelling. Results indicate that while classifiers exhibit high performance for specific datasets, their general applicability across diverse wind farms is limited at the present stage. Furthermore, differences in failure rate KPIs derived from manual versus classifier‐processed data reveal uncertainties in both methods. The study suggests that enhanced clarity in maintenance reporting and refined designation systems can lead to more accurate KPIs.

IET Renewable Power GenerationVol. 18(15)
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), University of Strathclyde (GB), Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy Systems (DE), L3S Research Center (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.