A Mystery of the Inconsistency Between Microwave Polarimetric Observations and Radiative Transfer Simulations

Abstract A factor of 2 difference is found between microwave brightness temperature (TB) observations and simulations from vector radiative transfer models. A physical explanation of this difference is related to the calibration process. In principle, for the calibration of polarimetric instruments of a total power radiometer, the radiation should be only half of the values derived from Planck function but in the actual calibration process, a full value is used. When this full value is converted to a TB it is approximately, but not exactly, twice the TB simulated by a vector radiative transfer model. This inconsistency is verified by simulations of three conically scanning microwave imagers (WindSat, AMSR2 and MWRI) and one cross‐track scanning microwave sounder (AMSU‐A). This difference cannot be compensated simply by dividing a factor of 2 to the processed TBs, especially at high frequencies or at low physical temperatures due to the nonlinear property of Planck function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl111553
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mystery of the Inconsistency Between Microwave Polarimetric Observations and Radiative Transfer Simulations

Fuzhong Weng, Ziqiang Zhu
1 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Climate variability and models
0.28
article

A Mystery of the Inconsistency Between Microwave Polarimetric Observations and Radiative Transfer Simulations

Fuzhong Weng, Ziqiang Zhu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract A factor of 2 difference is found between microwave brightness temperature (TB) observations and simulations from vector radiative transfer models. A physical explanation of this difference is related to the calibration process. In principle, for the calibration of polarimetric instruments of a total power radiometer, the radiation should be only half of the values derived from Planck function but in the actual calibration process, a full value is used. When this full value is converted to a TB it is approximately, but not exactly, twice the TB simulated by a vector radiative transfer model. This inconsistency is verified by simulations of three conically scanning microwave imagers (WindSat, AMSR2 and MWRI) and one cross‐track scanning microwave sounder (AMSU‐A). This difference cannot be compensated simply by dividing a factor of 2 to the processed TBs, especially at high frequencies or at low physical temperatures due to the nonlinear property of Planck function.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 51(21)
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Climate variability and models
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.