To evaluate and correlate the effectiveness of epidural depth equation versus pre-procedural US guided epidural block: A randomized controlled trial

Ultrasound assisted pre-procedural epidural depth estimation has improved the safety and efficacy of epidural block. Currently, the incorporation of pre-procedural ultrasound guided epidural derived equation(EDE) has significantly improved the accuracy of epidural depth estimation especially in the parturients. However, the accuracy of EDE derived epidural depth alone has not been compared to the actual epidural needle depth in non-obstetric patients. This study compared the efficacy of epidural depth equation (EDE) versus pre-procedural US-guided epidural block in patients scheduled for orthopedic surgeries under the combined spinal epidural block (CSE). The primary outcome was the number of attempts for successful epidural insertion, the secondary outcomes were correlations of EDE-calculated epidural depth with actual needle depth and pre-procedural US-guided epidural depth. One hundred patients, 20-60 years, ASA physical status I and II, body mass index (BMI) 18.5–29.9 kg.m were randomized into two groups. In group US (n=50), the pre-procedural US-guided skin to epidural depth was measured and the point of insertion of the epidural needle was marked. Whereas, in group E (n=50), the skin epidural depth was measured using the epidural depth equation (EDE). The epidural block was instituted by the loss of resistance technique in both groups. The primary outcome was the number of attempts for successful epidural insertion, the secondary outcomes were correlations of EDE-calculated epidural depth with actual needle depth and pre-procedural US-guided epidural depth. The needle passes were 1.10±0.08, and 1.18±0.05 in groups US, E respectively (P=0.251). A significantly strong correlation was observed between epidural depth by US and EDE (r2=0.915, P=0.001). Whereas, a weak correlation was observed in the EDE-measured epidural depth and actual needle depth (r=0.402, P =0.04). Although comparable needle attempts were observed in both groups, the weak correlation of epidural depth by EDE with actual needle depth doesn’t support its use alone. The strong correlation of epidural depths by EDE and US encourages EDE assisted with pre-procedural US-guided epidural block.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2024.089
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To evaluate and correlate the effectiveness of epidural depth equation versus pre-procedural US guided epidural block: A randomized controlled trial

Nanish Sharma, Versha Verma, Mohini Garg, Shelly Rana et al.
Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

To evaluate and correlate the effectiveness of epidural depth equation versus pre-procedural US guided epidural block: A randomized controlled trial

Nanish Sharma, Versha Verma, Mohini Garg, Shelly Rana, Aayushi Rani
article en

Abstract

Ultrasound assisted pre-procedural epidural depth estimation has improved the safety and efficacy of epidural block. Currently, the incorporation of pre-procedural ultrasound guided epidural derived equation(EDE) has significantly improved the accuracy of epidural depth estimation especially in the parturients. However, the accuracy of EDE derived epidural depth alone has not been compared to the actual epidural needle depth in non-obstetric patients. This study compared the efficacy of epidural depth equation (EDE) versus pre-procedural US-guided epidural block in patients scheduled for orthopedic surgeries under the combined spinal epidural block (CSE). The primary outcome was the number of attempts for successful epidural insertion, the secondary outcomes were correlations of EDE-calculated epidural depth with actual needle depth and pre-procedural US-guided epidural depth. One hundred patients, 20-60 years, ASA physical status I and II, body mass index (BMI) 18.5–29.9 kg.m were randomized into two groups. In group US (n=50), the pre-procedural US-guided skin to epidural depth was measured and the point of insertion of the epidural needle was marked. Whereas, in group E (n=50), the skin epidural depth was measured using the epidural depth equation (EDE). The epidural block was instituted by the loss of resistance technique in both groups. The primary outcome was the number of attempts for successful epidural insertion, the secondary outcomes were correlations of EDE-calculated epidural depth with actual needle depth and pre-procedural US-guided epidural depth. The needle passes were 1.10±0.08, and 1.18±0.05 in groups US, E respectively (P=0.251). A significantly strong correlation was observed between epidural depth by US and EDE (r2=0.915, P=0.001). Whereas, a weak correlation was observed in the EDE-measured epidural depth and actual needle depth (r=0.402, P =0.04). Although comparable needle attempts were observed in both groups, the weak correlation of epidural depth by EDE with actual needle depth doesn’t support its use alone. The strong correlation of epidural depths by EDE and US encourages EDE assisted with pre-procedural US-guided epidural block.

Indian Journal of Clinical AnaesthesiaVol. 11(4)
Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College (IN), Government Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.