Evaluation of local anaesthetic with adjuvants for postoperative analgesia through ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca compartment block in hip procedures

Hip surgeries often result in significant postoperative pain, affecting early mobilization and rehabilitation. The Fascia Iliaca compartment block (FICB), guided by ultrasound, is a regional anaesthesia technique that can reduce this pain. The addition of adjuvants to local anaesthetics may enhance the block's duration and quality. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of adding dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to 0.25% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in hip procedures. The study aims to compare the duration and quality of postoperative analgesia of ropivacaine and ropivacaine with additives such as dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone for ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block in patients undergoing three different lower limb orthopaedic procedures. To assess and compare the duration of post-operative analgesia between 0.25% ropivacaine, ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine with dexamethasone. : To assess and compare the time of requirement of rescue analgesia between the three groups This prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involved 60 patients undergoing hip surgeries including Total hip replacement (THR), Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS), and Proximal Femoral Nailing (PFN) divided equally into three groups. Group A received 0.25% ropivacaine with dexamethasone, Group B received 0.25% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine, and Group C received 0.25% ropivacaine with a placebo. The primary outcomes measured were the duration of analgesia and postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included the need for rescue analgesia and the incidence of side effects. Patients who received dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone experienced significantly longer durations of analgesia and lower postoperative pain scores in the first 24 hours compared to those who received the placebo. Additionally, the need for rescue analgesia was reduced, and the incidence of side effects was comparable between the groups receiving adjuvants and the placebo group. The order of better analgesia and prolonged duration was best with ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine, next best with ropivacaine and dexamethasone when compared to ropivacaine without adjuvant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2024.097
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of local anaesthetic with adjuvants for postoperative analgesia through ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca compartment block in hip procedures

Monica Daisy, Prem Kumar, Thamizhmathi Thangaraju
1 citations
Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia
Anesthesia and Pain Management
0.57
article

Evaluation of local anaesthetic with adjuvants for postoperative analgesia through ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca compartment block in hip procedures

Monica Daisy, Prem Kumar, Thamizhmathi Thangaraju
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Hip surgeries often result in significant postoperative pain, affecting early mobilization and rehabilitation. The Fascia Iliaca compartment block (FICB), guided by ultrasound, is a regional anaesthesia technique that can reduce this pain. The addition of adjuvants to local anaesthetics may enhance the block's duration and quality. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of adding dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to 0.25% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in hip procedures. The study aims to compare the duration and quality of postoperative analgesia of ropivacaine and ropivacaine with additives such as dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone for ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block in patients undergoing three different lower limb orthopaedic procedures. To assess and compare the duration of post-operative analgesia between 0.25% ropivacaine, ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine with dexamethasone. : To assess and compare the time of requirement of rescue analgesia between the three groups This prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involved 60 patients undergoing hip surgeries including Total hip replacement (THR), Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS), and Proximal Femoral Nailing (PFN) divided equally into three groups. Group A received 0.25% ropivacaine with dexamethasone, Group B received 0.25% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine, and Group C received 0.25% ropivacaine with a placebo. The primary outcomes measured were the duration of analgesia and postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included the need for rescue analgesia and the incidence of side effects. Patients who received dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone experienced significantly longer durations of analgesia and lower postoperative pain scores in the first 24 hours compared to those who received the placebo. Additionally, the need for rescue analgesia was reduced, and the incidence of side effects was comparable between the groups receiving adjuvants and the placebo group. The order of better analgesia and prolonged duration was best with ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine, next best with ropivacaine and dexamethasone when compared to ropivacaine without adjuvant.

Indian Journal of Clinical AnaesthesiaVol. 11(4)
Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.