US land sector mitigation investments and emissions implications

The land sector is anticipated to play an important role in achieving U.S. GHG emissions targets by reducing emissions and increasing sequestration from the atmosphere. This study assesses how much different levels of investment could stimulate land-based mitigation activities in the U.S. By applying a dynamic economic model of the land use sectors, with representation of 26 forestry and agricultural mitigation strategies across 11 U.S. regions, the study shows that annual investments of $2.4 billion could deliver abatement of around 80 MtCO<sub>2</sub>e annually. Under an optimal allocation of investments, the forestry sector and the Corn Belt are projected to receive the largest share of funds. Restricting land-based activities eligible for funds significantly reduces overall potential mitigation. For instance, if $24 billion investments are allocated only to agricultural activities, mitigation declines by 48% to 54 MtCO<sub>2</sub>e/yr over the next ten years. Finally, the level of abatement from each policy depends on the timing of implementation as the lowest cost mitigation actions are generally taken by the policy implemented first.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53915-w
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

US land sector mitigation investments and emissions implications

Yongxia Cai, Alice Favero, Christopher M. Wade, Jared Creason et al.
5 citations
Nature Communications
Climate Change Policy and Economics
5.65
article

US land sector mitigation investments and emissions implications

Yongxia Cai, Alice Favero, Christopher M. Wade, Jared Creason, Shaun Ragnauth, Sara Ohrel, Justin S. Baker, Bruce A. McCarl, Gregory S. Latta
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The land sector is anticipated to play an important role in achieving U.S. GHG emissions targets by reducing emissions and increasing sequestration from the atmosphere. This study assesses how much different levels of investment could stimulate land-based mitigation activities in the U.S. By applying a dynamic economic model of the land use sectors, with representation of 26 forestry and agricultural mitigation strategies across 11 U.S. regions, the study shows that annual investments of $2.4 billion could deliver abatement of around 80 MtCO<sub>2</sub>e annually. Under an optimal allocation of investments, the forestry sector and the Corn Belt are projected to receive the largest share of funds. Restricting land-based activities eligible for funds significantly reduces overall potential mitigation. For instance, if $24 billion investments are allocated only to agricultural activities, mitigation declines by 48% to 54 MtCO<sub>2</sub>e/yr over the next ten years. Finally, the level of abatement from each policy depends on the timing of implementation as the lowest cost mitigation actions are generally taken by the policy implemented first.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 15(1)
Environmental Protection Agency (US), North Carolina State University (US), University of Idaho (US), RTI International (US), North Central State College (US)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
5.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

US land sector mitigation investments and emissions implications — Yongxia Cai, Alice Favero, et al. · Nature Communications (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS