The Pronaf Impact On Rural Poverty In Brazil from 2013 to 2019

This paper aims to analyze the effects of the National Program for the Strengthening of Family Farming (Pronaf)[1] on rural poverty in Brazil in the period of 2013-2019. The methodology used to generate the estimates of the Pronaf-income and Pronaf-inequality elasticities was the dynamic panel model. The study assumes that the Pronaf variable does not affect rural poverty directly, but considers the variation in income and/or the variation in income inequality. The results indicate that increases in income and decreases in income inequality contribute to poverty reduction, with policies aimed at promoting income equality showing greater efficiency. However, the impact of Pronaf credit on poverty reduction is found to be limited, albeit positive but statistically insignificant, in raising rural household per capita income and reducing income inequality. Furthermore, the analysis reveals a persistence of poverty over time, indicating that current income and inequality levels influence future poverty rates. Pronaf credits were found to have a greater impact on income among wealthier and more developed states, while also exacerbating income concentration in those areas. [1] From the Portuguese: Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar (Pronaf).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies of Applied Economics
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25115/pwdv2615
Primary Topic
Rural Development and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Pronaf Impact On Rural Poverty In Brazil from 2013 to 2019

Ednaldo Michellon, Juliane Borchers
Studies of Applied Economics
Rural Development and Agriculture
article

The Pronaf Impact On Rural Poverty In Brazil from 2013 to 2019

Ednaldo Michellon, Juliane Borchers
article en

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the effects of the National Program for the Strengthening of Family Farming (Pronaf)[1] on rural poverty in Brazil in the period of 2013-2019. The methodology used to generate the estimates of the Pronaf-income and Pronaf-inequality elasticities was the dynamic panel model. The study assumes that the Pronaf variable does not affect rural poverty directly, but considers the variation in income and/or the variation in income inequality. The results indicate that increases in income and decreases in income inequality contribute to poverty reduction, with policies aimed at promoting income equality showing greater efficiency. However, the impact of Pronaf credit on poverty reduction is found to be limited, albeit positive but statistically insignificant, in raising rural household per capita income and reducing income inequality. Furthermore, the analysis reveals a persistence of poverty over time, indicating that current income and inequality levels influence future poverty rates. Pronaf credits were found to have a greater impact on income among wealthier and more developed states, while also exacerbating income concentration in those areas. [1] From the Portuguese: Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar (Pronaf).

Studies of Applied EconomicsVol. 42(3)
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Rural Development and Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.