Collaboration between clinicians and vision–language models in radiology report generation

Automated radiology report generation has the potential to improve patient care and reduce the workload of radiologists. However, the path toward real-world adoption has been stymied by the challenge of evaluating the clinical quality of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated reports. We build a state-of-the-art report generation system for chest radiographs, called Flamingo-CXR, and perform an expert evaluation of AI-generated reports by engaging a panel of board-certified radiologists. We observe a wide distribution of preferences across the panel and across clinical settings, with 56.1% of Flamingo-CXR intensive care reports evaluated to be preferable or equivalent to clinician reports, by half or more of the panel, rising to 77.7% for in/outpatient X-rays overall and to 94% for the subset of cases with no pertinent abnormal findings. Errors were observed in human-written reports and Flamingo-CXR reports, with 24.8% of in/outpatient cases containing clinically significant errors in both report types, 22.8% in Flamingo-CXR reports only and 14.0% in human reports only. For reports that contain errors we develop an assistive setting, a demonstration of clinician-AI collaboration for radiology report composition, indicating new possibilities for potential clinical utility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Medicine
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03302-1
Citations
116
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
46.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaboration between clinicians and vision–language models in radiology report generation

Shravya Shetty, Danielle Belgrave, Pushmeet Kohli, Tao Tu et al.
116 citations
Nature Medicine
Radiology practices and education
46.90
article

Collaboration between clinicians and vision–language models in radiology report generation

Shravya Shetty, Danielle Belgrave, Pushmeet Kohli, Tao Tu, Mike Schaekermann, Andrew Sellergren, S. M. Ali Eslami, Sreenivasa Raju Kalidindi, Joelle K. Barral, Shekoofeh Azizi, Sumanth Dathathri, Charles T. Lau, S. Sara Mahdavi, Ryutaro Tanno, Yossi Matias, Johannes Welbl, Sumedh Ghaisas, Sofia Ira Ktena, Po-Sen Huang, Roy Lee, Abigail See, Yun Liu, K. K. Singhal, Alan Karthikesalingam, Zahra Saeed Ahmed, Vivek Natarajan, SiWai Man, David G. T. Barrett, R. May
article en
116 citations

Abstract

Automated radiology report generation has the potential to improve patient care and reduce the workload of radiologists. However, the path toward real-world adoption has been stymied by the challenge of evaluating the clinical quality of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated reports. We build a state-of-the-art report generation system for chest radiographs, called Flamingo-CXR, and perform an expert evaluation of AI-generated reports by engaging a panel of board-certified radiologists. We observe a wide distribution of preferences across the panel and across clinical settings, with 56.1% of Flamingo-CXR intensive care reports evaluated to be preferable or equivalent to clinician reports, by half or more of the panel, rising to 77.7% for in/outpatient X-rays overall and to 94% for the subset of cases with no pertinent abnormal findings. Errors were observed in human-written reports and Flamingo-CXR reports, with 24.8% of in/outpatient cases containing clinically significant errors in both report types, 22.8% in Flamingo-CXR reports only and 14.0% in human reports only. For reports that contain errors we develop an assistive setting, a demonstration of clinician-AI collaboration for radiology report composition, indicating new possibilities for potential clinical utility.

Nature MedicineVol. 31(2)
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB), Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB), Google (United Kingdom) (GB), OpenAI (United States) (US)
DeepMind
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Radiology practices and education
46.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.