The paradox of knowledge hiding among academics: Implications for intellectual capital-driven knowledge transfer

This study analyzes the moderating effect of knowledge hiding (evasive hiding, playing dumb, and rationalized hiding) on the relationship between intellectual capital and knowledge transfer from universities to their surroundings. Previous research focused only on intra-university aspects like students’ performance and academic processes (teaching or research). Using structural equations modeling and survey data collected from 442 university research groups at the end of 2020 and early 2021, the findings revealed no negative influence of knowledge hiding. However, evasive hiding showed a significant and positive moderating effect. Contrary to the prevailing view that knowledge hiding hinders academic processes, this study shows that it is expected in both commercial and non-commercial contexts of knowledge transfer. Surprisingly, evasive hiding increases knowledge flow from universities by encouraging the affected researchers’ self-learning and resourcefulness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industry and Higher Education
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222241299670
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The paradox of knowledge hiding among academics: Implications for intellectual capital-driven knowledge transfer

José Arias-Pérez, David Restrepo-Gil, Óscar Suárez-Castellanos
2 citations
Industry and Higher Education
Knowledge Management and Sharing
1.91
article

The paradox of knowledge hiding among academics: Implications for intellectual capital-driven knowledge transfer

José Arias-Pérez, David Restrepo-Gil, Óscar Suárez-Castellanos
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study analyzes the moderating effect of knowledge hiding (evasive hiding, playing dumb, and rationalized hiding) on the relationship between intellectual capital and knowledge transfer from universities to their surroundings. Previous research focused only on intra-university aspects like students’ performance and academic processes (teaching or research). Using structural equations modeling and survey data collected from 442 university research groups at the end of 2020 and early 2021, the findings revealed no negative influence of knowledge hiding. However, evasive hiding showed a significant and positive moderating effect. Contrary to the prevailing view that knowledge hiding hinders academic processes, this study shows that it is expected in both commercial and non-commercial contexts of knowledge transfer. Surprisingly, evasive hiding increases knowledge flow from universities by encouraging the affected researchers’ self-learning and resourcefulness.

Industry and Higher EducationVol. 39(6)
Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.