Forest Fire Burn Scar Mapping Based on Modified Image Super-Resolution Reconstruction via Sparse Representation

It is of great significance to map forest fire burn scars for post-disaster management and assessment of forest fires. Satellites can be utilized to acquire imagery even in primitive forests with steep mountainous terrain. However, forest fire burn scar mapping extracted by the Burned Area Index (BAI), differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR), and Feature Extraction Rule-Based (FERB) approaches directly at pixel level is limited by the satellite imagery spatial resolution. To further improve the spatial resolution of forest fire burn scar mapping, we improved the image super-resolution reconstruction via sparse representation (SCSR) and named it modified image super-resolution reconstruction via sparse representation (MSCSR). It was compared with the Burned Area Subpixel Mapping–Feature Extraction Rule-Based (BASM-FERB) method to screen a better approach. Based on the Sentinel-2 satellite imagery, the MSCSR and BASM-FERB approaches were used to map forest fire burn scars at the subpixel level, and the extraction result was validated using actual forest fire data. The results show that forest fire burn scar mapping at the subpixel level obtained by the MSCSR and BASM-FERB approaches has a higher spatial resolution; in particular, the MSCSR approach can more effectively reduce the noise effect on forest fire burn scar mapping at the subpixel level. Five accuracy indexes, the Overall Accuracy (OA), User’s Accuracy (UA), Producer’s Accuracy (PA), Intersection over Union (IoU), and Kappa Coefficient (Kappa), are used to assess the accuracy of forest fire burn scar mapping at the pixel/subpixel level based on the BAI, dNBR, FERB, MSCSR and BASM-FERB approaches. The average accuracy values of the OA, UA, PA, IoU, and Kappa of the forest fire burn scar mapping results at the subpixel level extracted by the MSCSR and BASM-FERB approaches are superior compared to the forest fire burn scar mapping results at the pixel level extracted by the BAI, dNBR and FERB approaches. In particular, the average accuracy values of the OA, UA, PA, IoU, and Kappa of the forest fire burn scar mapping at the subpixel level detected by the MSCSR approach are 98.49%, 99.13%, 92.31%, 95.83%, and 92.81%, respectively, which are 1.48%, 10.93%, 2.47%, 15.55%, and 5.90%, respectively, higher than the accuracy of that extracted by the BASM-FERB approach. It is concluded that the MSCSR approach extracts forest fire burn scar mapping at the subpixel level with higher accuracy and spatial resolution for post-disaster management and assessment of forest fires.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f15111959
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forest Fire Burn Scar Mapping Based on Modified Image Super-Resolution Reconstruction via Sparse Representation

Yongke Yang, Haizhou Xu, Juan Zhang, Saizhuan Wang et al.
Forests
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Forest Fire Burn Scar Mapping Based on Modified Image Super-Resolution Reconstruction via Sparse Representation

Yongke Yang, Haizhou Xu, Juan Zhang, Saizhuan Wang, Gui Zhang, Rong Chu
article en

Abstract

It is of great significance to map forest fire burn scars for post-disaster management and assessment of forest fires. Satellites can be utilized to acquire imagery even in primitive forests with steep mountainous terrain. However, forest fire burn scar mapping extracted by the Burned Area Index (BAI), differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR), and Feature Extraction Rule-Based (FERB) approaches directly at pixel level is limited by the satellite imagery spatial resolution. To further improve the spatial resolution of forest fire burn scar mapping, we improved the image super-resolution reconstruction via sparse representation (SCSR) and named it modified image super-resolution reconstruction via sparse representation (MSCSR). It was compared with the Burned Area Subpixel Mapping–Feature Extraction Rule-Based (BASM-FERB) method to screen a better approach. Based on the Sentinel-2 satellite imagery, the MSCSR and BASM-FERB approaches were used to map forest fire burn scars at the subpixel level, and the extraction result was validated using actual forest fire data. The results show that forest fire burn scar mapping at the subpixel level obtained by the MSCSR and BASM-FERB approaches has a higher spatial resolution; in particular, the MSCSR approach can more effectively reduce the noise effect on forest fire burn scar mapping at the subpixel level. Five accuracy indexes, the Overall Accuracy (OA), User’s Accuracy (UA), Producer’s Accuracy (PA), Intersection over Union (IoU), and Kappa Coefficient (Kappa), are used to assess the accuracy of forest fire burn scar mapping at the pixel/subpixel level based on the BAI, dNBR, FERB, MSCSR and BASM-FERB approaches. The average accuracy values of the OA, UA, PA, IoU, and Kappa of the forest fire burn scar mapping results at the subpixel level extracted by the MSCSR and BASM-FERB approaches are superior compared to the forest fire burn scar mapping results at the pixel level extracted by the BAI, dNBR and FERB approaches. In particular, the average accuracy values of the OA, UA, PA, IoU, and Kappa of the forest fire burn scar mapping at the subpixel level detected by the MSCSR approach are 98.49%, 99.13%, 92.31%, 95.83%, and 92.81%, respectively, which are 1.48%, 10.93%, 2.47%, 15.55%, and 5.90%, respectively, higher than the accuracy of that extracted by the BASM-FERB approach. It is concluded that the MSCSR approach extracts forest fire burn scar mapping at the subpixel level with higher accuracy and spatial resolution for post-disaster management and assessment of forest fires.

ForestsVol. 15(11)
Central South University of Forestry and Technology (CN), Central South University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.