The Effects of Irrigation and Nitrogen Application on the Water and Nitrogen Utilization Characteristics of Drip-Irrigated Winter Wheat in the North China Plain

Reducing irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer application while maintaining crop yields is crucial for sustainable agriculture in the North China Plain. To investigate the effects of irrigation and nitrogen application on above-ground nitrogen accumulation (ANA), yield, water consumption, and the water and nitrogen use efficiency of drip-irrigated winter wheat, a three-season field experiment was conducted with four levels of nitrogen fertilizer application (250, 167, 83, and 0 kg hm−2, referred to as N3, N2, N1, and N0, respectively) and three levels of irrigation (80, 60, and 40 mm per irrigation event, referred to as W3, W1, and W1, respectively). Additionally, a control treatment (CK) was set up with almost no irrigation (only 10 mm of fertilizer water for topdressing was applied) at the N3 application level. The results indicated that over the three seasons, the average yield of irrigation treatments was 35.3% higher than that of the CK treatment under the N3 condition. Both irrigation and nitrogen application improved wheat yield and ANA; however, when irrigation exceeded W2 or nitrogen application exceeded N2, their positive effects were negligible. Due to the seasonal depletion of soil nitrogen by low-nitrogen treatments (N1 and N0), along with their other negative effects on soil health, the yields and ANA of N1 and N0 treatments gradually declined over seasons. Increased irrigation promoted evapotranspiration (ET), and when nitrogen application did not exceed N2, higher nitrogen levels also enhanced ET and soil water consumption within ET. Moderately reducing irrigation can enhance water use efficiency (WUE); however, extreme water scarcity can also decrease WUE. Compared to higher irrigation and nitrogen application treatments, the W2N2 treatment showed no significant decrease in either yield or WUE, along with an increase in NPE. Moreover, the NPFP of the N2 treatment was higher than that of the N3 treatment. Consequently, the W2N2 treatment is recommend as the optimal irrigation and nitrogen management strategy under the experimental conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112629
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Irrigation and Nitrogen Application on the Water and Nitrogen Utilization Characteristics of Drip-Irrigated Winter Wheat in the North China Plain

Mouchao Lv, Jingtao Qin, Xiaosen Wang, Xichao Fan et al.
2 citations
Agronomy
Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
2.06
article

The Effects of Irrigation and Nitrogen Application on the Water and Nitrogen Utilization Characteristics of Drip-Irrigated Winter Wheat in the North China Plain

Mouchao Lv, Jingtao Qin, Xiaosen Wang, Xichao Fan, Mingliang Jiang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Reducing irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer application while maintaining crop yields is crucial for sustainable agriculture in the North China Plain. To investigate the effects of irrigation and nitrogen application on above-ground nitrogen accumulation (ANA), yield, water consumption, and the water and nitrogen use efficiency of drip-irrigated winter wheat, a three-season field experiment was conducted with four levels of nitrogen fertilizer application (250, 167, 83, and 0 kg hm−2, referred to as N3, N2, N1, and N0, respectively) and three levels of irrigation (80, 60, and 40 mm per irrigation event, referred to as W3, W1, and W1, respectively). Additionally, a control treatment (CK) was set up with almost no irrigation (only 10 mm of fertilizer water for topdressing was applied) at the N3 application level. The results indicated that over the three seasons, the average yield of irrigation treatments was 35.3% higher than that of the CK treatment under the N3 condition. Both irrigation and nitrogen application improved wheat yield and ANA; however, when irrigation exceeded W2 or nitrogen application exceeded N2, their positive effects were negligible. Due to the seasonal depletion of soil nitrogen by low-nitrogen treatments (N1 and N0), along with their other negative effects on soil health, the yields and ANA of N1 and N0 treatments gradually declined over seasons. Increased irrigation promoted evapotranspiration (ET), and when nitrogen application did not exceed N2, higher nitrogen levels also enhanced ET and soil water consumption within ET. Moderately reducing irrigation can enhance water use efficiency (WUE); however, extreme water scarcity can also decrease WUE. Compared to higher irrigation and nitrogen application treatments, the W2N2 treatment showed no significant decrease in either yield or WUE, along with an increase in NPE. Moreover, the NPFP of the N2 treatment was higher than that of the N3 treatment. Consequently, the W2N2 treatment is recommend as the optimal irrigation and nitrogen management strategy under the experimental conditions.

AgronomyVol. 14(11)
Farmland Irrigation Research Institute (CN), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.