Removing Instrumental Noise in Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data: A Comparison Between Two Deep Learning Approaches

Over the last decade, distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) has received growing attention in the field of seismic acquisition and monitoring due to its potential high spatial sampling rate, low maintenance cost and high resistance to temperature and pressure. Despite its undeniable advantages, DAS faces some challenges, including a low signal-to-noise ratio, which partly results from the instrument-specific noise generated by DAS interrogators. We present a comparison between two deep learning approaches to address DAS hardware noise and enhance the quality of DAS data. These approaches have the advantage of including real instrumental noise in the neural network training dataset. For the supervised learning (SL) approach, real DAS instrumental noise measured on an acoustically isolated coil is added to synthetic data to generate training pairs of clean/noisy data. For the second method, the Noise2Noise (N2N) approach, the training is performed on noisy/noisy data pairs recorded simultaneously on the downgoing and upgoing parts of a downhole fiber-optic cable. Both approaches allow for the removal of unwanted noise that lies within the same frequency band of the useful signal, a result that cannot be achieved by conventional denoising techniques employing frequency filtering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224150
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Seismic Waves and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Removing Instrumental Noise in Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data: A Comparison Between Two Deep Learning Approaches

Konstantin Tertyshnikov, Xi-Hao Gu, Roman Pevzner, Olivia Collet
7 citations
Remote Sensing
Seismic Waves and Analysis
3.74
article

Removing Instrumental Noise in Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data: A Comparison Between Two Deep Learning Approaches

Konstantin Tertyshnikov, Xi-Hao Gu, Roman Pevzner, Olivia Collet
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Over the last decade, distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) has received growing attention in the field of seismic acquisition and monitoring due to its potential high spatial sampling rate, low maintenance cost and high resistance to temperature and pressure. Despite its undeniable advantages, DAS faces some challenges, including a low signal-to-noise ratio, which partly results from the instrument-specific noise generated by DAS interrogators. We present a comparison between two deep learning approaches to address DAS hardware noise and enhance the quality of DAS data. These approaches have the advantage of including real instrumental noise in the neural network training dataset. For the supervised learning (SL) approach, real DAS instrumental noise measured on an acoustically isolated coil is added to synthetic data to generate training pairs of clean/noisy data. For the second method, the Noise2Noise (N2N) approach, the training is performed on noisy/noisy data pairs recorded simultaneously on the downgoing and upgoing parts of a downhole fiber-optic cable. Both approaches allow for the removal of unwanted noise that lies within the same frequency band of the useful signal, a result that cannot be achieved by conventional denoising techniques employing frequency filtering.

Remote SensingVol. 16(22)
Curtin University (AU), China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Seismic Waves and Analysis
3.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Removing Instrumental Noise in Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data: A Comparison Between Two Deep Learning Approaches — Konstantin Tertyshnikov, Xi-Hao Gu, et al. · Remote Sensing (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS