Quantifying the Impact of Multiple Factors on Air Quality Model Simulation Biases Using Machine Learning

Accurate air pollutant prediction is essential for addressing environmental and public health concerns. Air quality models like WRF-CMAQ provide simulations, but often show significant errors compared to observed concentrations. To identify the sources of these model biases, we applied the XGBoost machine learning algorithm to assess the performance of WRF-CMAQ in predicting air pollutants across two regions in China. XGBoost models trained with observations achieved high accuracy (R > 0.95), indicating that the selected features effectively capture pollutant variations. When trained on WRF-CMAQ inputs, XGBoost still improved performance but revealed biases linked to both model inputs (10–60%) and mechanisms (1–30%). Analysis identified previous-hour pollutant levels as the largest bias contributor, followed by meteorological variables. The study highlights the need for improving both model inputs and mechanisms to enhance future air quality predictions and support pollution control strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111337
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the Impact of Multiple Factors on Air Quality Model Simulation Biases Using Machine Learning

Jia Xing, R. J. Wang, Mengfan Teng, Chunying Fan et al.
3 citations
Atmosphere
Air Quality and Health Impacts
0.94
article

Quantifying the Impact of Multiple Factors on Air Quality Model Simulation Biases Using Machine Learning

Jia Xing, R. J. Wang, Mengfan Teng, Chunying Fan, H. F. Liu, Siwei Li, Ge Song, Zhujun Li, Maolin Zhang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Accurate air pollutant prediction is essential for addressing environmental and public health concerns. Air quality models like WRF-CMAQ provide simulations, but often show significant errors compared to observed concentrations. To identify the sources of these model biases, we applied the XGBoost machine learning algorithm to assess the performance of WRF-CMAQ in predicting air pollutants across two regions in China. XGBoost models trained with observations achieved high accuracy (R > 0.95), indicating that the selected features effectively capture pollutant variations. When trained on WRF-CMAQ inputs, XGBoost still improved performance but revealed biases linked to both model inputs (10–60%) and mechanisms (1–30%). Analysis identified previous-hour pollutant levels as the largest bias contributor, followed by meteorological variables. The study highlights the need for improving both model inputs and mechanisms to enhance future air quality predictions and support pollution control strategies.

AtmosphereVol. 15(11)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Wuhan University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying Mapping and Remote Sensing (CN), Institute of Software (CN), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying the Impact of Multiple Factors on Air Quality Model Simulation Biases Using Machine Learning — Jia Xing, R. J. Wang, et al. · Atmosphere (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS