Assessing weak interaction and threshold effects of the trophic field overlap index on the relationship between species uniqueness and centrality in food webs

In addition to considering the influence of a species on other species (centrality), the identification of keystone species should also consider whether it has a unique network position (uniqueness). Clarifying the correlation between species centrality and uniqueness, or whether central species exhibit positional redundancy in food webs, can enhance the understanding of mechanisms stabilizing food webs. However, the findings from analyses utilizing different measures of uniqueness are contentious. In this study, we constructed the food web of the eutrophic Zhangze Lake (northern China) using stable isotopes to estimate the contribution of food sources to consumers. We then calculated trophic field overlap index to assess the uniqueness of species using this quantified food web information. Additionally, we analyzed how the weak interaction and the threshold value under which interactions are considered as weak influence the relationship between species uniqueness and centrality. The findings revealed that, in contrast to the traditional trophic field overlap index, the improved index identified the basal species with the strongest trophic interactions with other species and the filter‐feeding fishes with the fewest interactors as the most unique species, while the basal species were considered the least unique under the traditional index. The ranking results of the traditional index and the centrality showed a significant negative correlation, whereas the improved index displayed a positive correlation, which was caused by the comprehensive consideration of threshold and weak interaction. In addition, based on the data analysis, the suggestion was given for the selection of indices used to identify unique species, and whether central species have positional redundancy was explored. The methodology used in study provides a practical solution for the identification of the most unique species, points out and solves the problems faced in the uniqueness analysis, and advances the understanding of the mechanisms underlying food web robustness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oikos
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.10803
Primary Topic
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing weak interaction and threshold effects of the trophic field overlap index on the relationship between species uniqueness and centrality in food webs

Minquan Feng, Zimeng Liu, Ruijing Yang
Oikos
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
article

Assessing weak interaction and threshold effects of the trophic field overlap index on the relationship between species uniqueness and centrality in food webs

Minquan Feng, Zimeng Liu, Ruijing Yang
article en

Abstract

In addition to considering the influence of a species on other species (centrality), the identification of keystone species should also consider whether it has a unique network position (uniqueness). Clarifying the correlation between species centrality and uniqueness, or whether central species exhibit positional redundancy in food webs, can enhance the understanding of mechanisms stabilizing food webs. However, the findings from analyses utilizing different measures of uniqueness are contentious. In this study, we constructed the food web of the eutrophic Zhangze Lake (northern China) using stable isotopes to estimate the contribution of food sources to consumers. We then calculated trophic field overlap index to assess the uniqueness of species using this quantified food web information. Additionally, we analyzed how the weak interaction and the threshold value under which interactions are considered as weak influence the relationship between species uniqueness and centrality. The findings revealed that, in contrast to the traditional trophic field overlap index, the improved index identified the basal species with the strongest trophic interactions with other species and the filter‐feeding fishes with the fewest interactors as the most unique species, while the basal species were considered the least unique under the traditional index. The ranking results of the traditional index and the centrality showed a significant negative correlation, whereas the improved index displayed a positive correlation, which was caused by the comprehensive consideration of threshold and weak interaction. In addition, based on the data analysis, the suggestion was given for the selection of indices used to identify unique species, and whether central species have positional redundancy was explored. The methodology used in study provides a practical solution for the identification of the most unique species, points out and solves the problems faced in the uniqueness analysis, and advances the understanding of the mechanisms underlying food web robustness.

OikosVol. 2025(2)
Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.