Recent Increases in Violence Against Physicians and Plastic Surgeons

INTRODUCTION In recent years, violence against physicians has significantly increased, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, encompassing both physical and psychological harm. Data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics show a roughly 63% increase in violence against all healthcare workers from 2011 to 2018 (Fig. 1).1 This increase was not specific to the United States, as a meta-analysis of more than 60,000 healthcare workers indicated that 43% of healthcare workers experienced some form of violence during the COVID-19 pandemic.2 Although there is a paucity of data regarding trends of violence toward plastic surgeons specifically, a 2019 survey showed that 66.9% of plastic surgery residents witnessed and 39.1% experienced abuse or harassment during training.3Fig. 1.: The chart displays the incident rate for nonfatal workplace violence to healthcare workers between 2011 and 2018.IMPACT ON PHYSICIANS AND THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM The consequences of such violence are profound, affecting both individuals and the healthcare system. Physicians subjected to violence report higher levels of emotional exhaustion, lower job satisfaction, and increased burnout leading to higher turnover rates.4,5 Plastic surgery may be particularly vulnerable, given that there is already a shortage of plastic surgeons in many regions of the United States. This turnover could also negatively impact the healthcare system by reducing the quality of care provided due to loss of continuity and increasing operational costs due to inefficiencies. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS Several factors have contributed to the rise in violence. First, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated public mistrust of the healthcare system. Economic hardships resulting from the pandemic have also played a role, as economic strain often correlates with increased violence. Other factors include high healthcare costs, long wait times, and overworked staff—issues that predate the pandemic but have worsened during this period.6 Unmet patient expectations can also result in violence, making plastic surgeons, whose work often involves managing expectations, particularly vulnerable. PREVENTIVE MEASURES To combat this issue, several measures can be implemented. Training healthcare workers to recognize and de-escalate potential violence is crucial. Workplace design alterations, such as controlled access points and panic buttons, can help reduce incidents. Stricter penalties for antiphysician violence may act as a deterrent. However, these strategies have limitations. Their effectiveness varies and depends on institutional support, and enforcing increased penalties can be challenging.7 LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS Two major pieces of legislation have been introduced in the US Congress in response to the growing violence. The Workplace Violence Prevention for Health Care and Social Services Workers Act mandates employers to develop workplace violence prevention plans with employee involvement. The Safety from Violence for Healthcare Employees Act proposes stronger penalties for assaulting or intimidating healthcare workers and aims to improve security within healthcare settings. Although these legislative efforts are significant, they also have limitations, such as potential economic burdens on hospitals and an overemphasis on punitive rather than preventive measures (Table 1). Table 1. - Comparing Legislation to Prevent Violence Against Healthcare Workers Workplace Violence Prevention for Health Care and Social Services Workers Act (H.R. 1195/S. 1176) Safety from Violence for Healthcare Employees Act (H.R. 2584/S. 2768) Objective To direct the Department of Labor to issue a standard requiring healthcare and social service employers to develop and implement comprehensive workplace violence prevention plans To provide federal protections for healthcare workers from workplace violence similar to those for airport and aircraft employees Key provisions Develop and implement a workplace violence prevention plan, conduct risk assessments, training programs, record and report incidents of violence Establishes penalties for assaults on healthcare workers, enhances security measures, promotes collaboration with law enforcement Focus Proactive and preventive measures Reactive and protective measures Implementation requirements Employers must create tailored workplace violence prevention plans, conduct regular risk assessments, and provide training to employees Implementation of emergency response protocols, increased security measures, legal protections for workers Enforcement mechanisms Occupational Safety and Health Administration oversees enforcement with potential fines for noncompliance Federal penalties for offenders, collaboration with law enforcement agencies Support and resources Emphasis on training and proactive risk management, involvement of employees in plan development Focus on immediate protection and legal recourse, potentially strong deterrent effect Potential effectiveness High potential for reducing violence through proactive measures and comprehensive planning. Provides immediate protection for healthcare workers and legal consequences for offenders Limitations Resource-intensive, implementation consistency may vary, requires significant investment and ongoing maintenance May not address underlying causes of violence, effectiveness depends on enforcement, more reactive than preventive ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Professional organizations such as the American Society of Plastic Surgeons are essential in advocating for physician protection. These organizations can influence lawmakers, introduce relevant legislation, and promote safety research and education. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons’s involvement in lobbying for the Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act demonstrates their potential impact. Similar advocacy efforts can help develop effective legislation to prevent physician violence. CONCLUSIONS Addressing workplace violence against physicians is crucial for maintaining healthcare system integrity. Collaboration between policymakers, administrators, and professional organizations is essential for implementing effective safety measures, ensuring physician well-being, and enhancing patient care quality. DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000006329
Primary Topic
Workplace Violence and Bullying
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recent Increases in Violence Against Physicians and Plastic Surgeons

Ellen C. Shaffrey, Keenan S. Fine, Peter J. Wirth, Pradeep K. Attaluri et al.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Workplace Violence and Bullying
article

Recent Increases in Violence Against Physicians and Plastic Surgeons

Ellen C. Shaffrey, Keenan S. Fine, Peter J. Wirth, Pradeep K. Attaluri, Venkat K. Rao
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION In recent years, violence against physicians has significantly increased, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, encompassing both physical and psychological harm. Data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics show a roughly 63% increase in violence against all healthcare workers from 2011 to 2018 (Fig. 1).1 This increase was not specific to the United States, as a meta-analysis of more than 60,000 healthcare workers indicated that 43% of healthcare workers experienced some form of violence during the COVID-19 pandemic.2 Although there is a paucity of data regarding trends of violence toward plastic surgeons specifically, a 2019 survey showed that 66.9% of plastic surgery residents witnessed and 39.1% experienced abuse or harassment during training.3Fig. 1.: The chart displays the incident rate for nonfatal workplace violence to healthcare workers between 2011 and 2018.IMPACT ON PHYSICIANS AND THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM The consequences of such violence are profound, affecting both individuals and the healthcare system. Physicians subjected to violence report higher levels of emotional exhaustion, lower job satisfaction, and increased burnout leading to higher turnover rates.4,5 Plastic surgery may be particularly vulnerable, given that there is already a shortage of plastic surgeons in many regions of the United States. This turnover could also negatively impact the healthcare system by reducing the quality of care provided due to loss of continuity and increasing operational costs due to inefficiencies. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS Several factors have contributed to the rise in violence. First, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated public mistrust of the healthcare system. Economic hardships resulting from the pandemic have also played a role, as economic strain often correlates with increased violence. Other factors include high healthcare costs, long wait times, and overworked staff—issues that predate the pandemic but have worsened during this period.6 Unmet patient expectations can also result in violence, making plastic surgeons, whose work often involves managing expectations, particularly vulnerable. PREVENTIVE MEASURES To combat this issue, several measures can be implemented. Training healthcare workers to recognize and de-escalate potential violence is crucial. Workplace design alterations, such as controlled access points and panic buttons, can help reduce incidents. Stricter penalties for antiphysician violence may act as a deterrent. However, these strategies have limitations. Their effectiveness varies and depends on institutional support, and enforcing increased penalties can be challenging.7 LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS Two major pieces of legislation have been introduced in the US Congress in response to the growing violence. The Workplace Violence Prevention for Health Care and Social Services Workers Act mandates employers to develop workplace violence prevention plans with employee involvement. The Safety from Violence for Healthcare Employees Act proposes stronger penalties for assaulting or intimidating healthcare workers and aims to improve security within healthcare settings. Although these legislative efforts are significant, they also have limitations, such as potential economic burdens on hospitals and an overemphasis on punitive rather than preventive measures (Table 1). Table 1. - Comparing Legislation to Prevent Violence Against Healthcare Workers Workplace Violence Prevention for Health Care and Social Services Workers Act (H.R. 1195/S. 1176) Safety from Violence for Healthcare Employees Act (H.R. 2584/S. 2768) Objective To direct the Department of Labor to issue a standard requiring healthcare and social service employers to develop and implement comprehensive workplace violence prevention plans To provide federal protections for healthcare workers from workplace violence similar to those for airport and aircraft employees Key provisions Develop and implement a workplace violence prevention plan, conduct risk assessments, training programs, record and report incidents of violence Establishes penalties for assaults on healthcare workers, enhances security measures, promotes collaboration with law enforcement Focus Proactive and preventive measures Reactive and protective measures Implementation requirements Employers must create tailored workplace violence prevention plans, conduct regular risk assessments, and provide training to employees Implementation of emergency response protocols, increased security measures, legal protections for workers Enforcement mechanisms Occupational Safety and Health Administration oversees enforcement with potential fines for noncompliance Federal penalties for offenders, collaboration with law enforcement agencies Support and resources Emphasis on training and proactive risk management, involvement of employees in plan development Focus on immediate protection and legal recourse, potentially strong deterrent effect Potential effectiveness High potential for reducing violence through proactive measures and comprehensive planning. Provides immediate protection for healthcare workers and legal consequences for offenders Limitations Resource-intensive, implementation consistency may vary, requires significant investment and ongoing maintenance May not address underlying causes of violence, effectiveness depends on enforcement, more reactive than preventive ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Professional organizations such as the American Society of Plastic Surgeons are essential in advocating for physician protection. These organizations can influence lawmakers, introduce relevant legislation, and promote safety research and education. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons’s involvement in lobbying for the Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act demonstrates their potential impact. Similar advocacy efforts can help develop effective legislation to prevent physician violence. CONCLUSIONS Addressing workplace violence against physicians is crucial for maintaining healthcare system integrity. Collaboration between policymakers, administrators, and professional organizations is essential for implementing effective safety measures, ensuring physician well-being, and enhancing patient care quality. DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 12(11)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Workplace Violence and Bullying
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.