Disparities in Global Authorship and Data Source in the <i>Pediatric Blood and Cancer</i> Journal 2011–2021: Realities and Strategies for Improvement

As more than 80% of children live in LMICs and the WHO Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer is increasingly engaged across LMICs, all researchers/clinicians must justly be given an opportunity to conduct, write, publish, and be recognized for their research. PBC is uniquely poised to promote equitable publishing practices and opportunities for professional recognition by drawing on emerging best practices for equitable authorship, including potentially restructuring authorship guidelines and requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.31413
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in Global Authorship and Data Source in the Pediatric Blood and Cancer Journal 2011–2021: Realities and Strategies for Improvement

Julia Challinor, Elizabeth Sniderman, Md Irteja Islam, Dorcas Malahlela et al.
2 citations
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.09
article

Disparities in Global Authorship and Data Source in the Pediatric Blood and Cancer Journal 2011–2021: Realities and Strategies for Improvement

Julia Challinor, Elizabeth Sniderman, Md Irteja Islam, Dorcas Malahlela, Kathryn Burns, Yuanhui Luo, Alexandra Martiniuk, Anita Pickard, Dominic Agyemang Opoku
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As more than 80% of children live in LMICs and the WHO Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer is increasingly engaged across LMICs, all researchers/clinicians must justly be given an opportunity to conduct, write, publish, and be recognized for their research. PBC is uniquely poised to promote equitable publishing practices and opportunities for professional recognition by drawing on emerging best practices for equitable authorship, including potentially restructuring authorship guidelines and requirements.

Pediatric Blood & CancerVol. 72(2)
The University of Sydney (AU), Central South University (CN), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Toronto (CA), University of Southern Queensland (AU), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), Public Health Ontario (CA), Regent University College of Science and Technology (GH), Higher Institute for Qualitative Studies (EG), Stollery Children's Hospital (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disparities in Global Authorship and Data Source in the <i>Pediatric Blood and Cancer</i> Journal 2011–2021: Realities and Strategies for Improvement — Julia Challinor, Elizabeth Sniderman, et al. · Pediatric Blood & Cancer (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS