Who’s in? Variance in top management team definition effect on corporate political activity

Purpose Causal relationships between top management team (TMT) characteristics and corporate political activity (CPA) are well established in management literature. Yet, recent research has uncovered that there is little consistency in how researchers operationalize the TMT. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to empirically demonstrate how variation in TMT operationalization can affect causal relationships between TMT characteristics and CPA. Theoretical implications for these findings are discussed. Design/methodology/approach This study examines how varying the operationalization of the TMT affects the statistical outcomes of random-effects negative binomial regression models that examine how the state-level CPA of the largest 100 firms headquartered in Texas (from 2000 to 2010) is influenced by TMT characteristics. Findings How the TMT is operationalized greatly affects the level and significance of study results. These findings inform TMT and CPA research theoretically and statistically. Research limitations/implications This study underscores the importance of definition of TMT in studies where it is a variable. Originality/value This study provides novel insights into how TMT operationalization can greatly affect TMT research and theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAM Advanced Management Journal
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/samamj-03-2024-0001
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who’s in? Variance in top management team definition effect on corporate political activity

Andrew Franklin Johnson, Aaron T. McDonald
SAM Advanced Management Journal
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

Who’s in? Variance in top management team definition effect on corporate political activity

Andrew Franklin Johnson, Aaron T. McDonald
article en

Abstract

Purpose Causal relationships between top management team (TMT) characteristics and corporate political activity (CPA) are well established in management literature. Yet, recent research has uncovered that there is little consistency in how researchers operationalize the TMT. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to empirically demonstrate how variation in TMT operationalization can affect causal relationships between TMT characteristics and CPA. Theoretical implications for these findings are discussed. Design/methodology/approach This study examines how varying the operationalization of the TMT affects the statistical outcomes of random-effects negative binomial regression models that examine how the state-level CPA of the largest 100 firms headquartered in Texas (from 2000 to 2010) is influenced by TMT characteristics. Findings How the TMT is operationalized greatly affects the level and significance of study results. These findings inform TMT and CPA research theoretically and statistically. Research limitations/implications This study underscores the importance of definition of TMT in studies where it is a variable. Originality/value This study provides novel insights into how TMT operationalization can greatly affect TMT research and theory.

SAM Advanced Management JournalVol. 89(4)
California State University, San Marcos (US), Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.