Comparative Accuracy of Stationary and Smartphone-Based Photogrammetry in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Clinical Study

<b>Background:</b> Three-dimensional facial scan technologies, such as stereophotogrammetry, are frequently used in oral and maxillofacial surgery, dentistry, and plastic surgery to assess patient outcomes and plan surgical procedures. Most facial scanners rely on stationary clinical systems, which provide high accuracy and reliability in generating 3D representations of the human face; however, they are cost-intensive and immobile. Recently, smartphone-based facial scan applications that use stereophotogrammetry have been developed. These applications are cost-effective and more accessible than existing stationary systems. <b>Methods:</b> In this study, we compared the accuracy of three different smartphone applications-EM3D, Polycam, and ScandyPro-on an iPhone 14 Pro, which utilizes Apple's LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) technology, to a stationary system by 3DMD, which is considered a gold standard in many studies. <b>Results:</b> The applications included in the study have demonstrated the capability to perform accurately in clinical settings, with mean surface distances of 1.46 mm for EM3D, 1.66 mm for Polycam, and 1.61 mm for ScandyPro. <b>Conclusions:</b> These results suggest that smartphone-based facial scan systems could be a viable alternative, particularly in resource-limited settings. However, further research and collaboration between academia and industry are necessary to fully integrate these technologies into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226678
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Accuracy of Stationary and Smartphone-Based Photogrammetry in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Clinical Study

A Aigner, Michel Beyer, Robert Sader, Lukas Benedikt Seifert et al.
11 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Digital Imaging in Medicine
5.97
article

Comparative Accuracy of Stationary and Smartphone-Based Photogrammetry in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Clinical Study

A Aigner, Michel Beyer, Robert Sader, Lukas Benedikt Seifert, Florian M. Thieringer, Sead Abazi, Vanessa Czok
article en
11 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Three-dimensional facial scan technologies, such as stereophotogrammetry, are frequently used in oral and maxillofacial surgery, dentistry, and plastic surgery to assess patient outcomes and plan surgical procedures. Most facial scanners rely on stationary clinical systems, which provide high accuracy and reliability in generating 3D representations of the human face; however, they are cost-intensive and immobile. Recently, smartphone-based facial scan applications that use stereophotogrammetry have been developed. These applications are cost-effective and more accessible than existing stationary systems. <b>Methods:</b> In this study, we compared the accuracy of three different smartphone applications-EM3D, Polycam, and ScandyPro-on an iPhone 14 Pro, which utilizes Apple's LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) technology, to a stationary system by 3DMD, which is considered a gold standard in many studies. <b>Results:</b> The applications included in the study have demonstrated the capability to perform accurately in clinical settings, with mean surface distances of 1.46 mm for EM3D, 1.66 mm for Polycam, and 1.61 mm for ScandyPro. <b>Conclusions:</b> These results suggest that smartphone-based facial scan systems could be a viable alternative, particularly in resource-limited settings. However, further research and collaboration between academia and industry are necessary to fully integrate these technologies into clinical practice.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(22)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University of Basel (CH), University Hospital of Basel (CH), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Imaging in Medicine
5.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.