Comparative Analysis of Statistical, Time–Frequency, and SVM Techniques for Change Detection in Nonlinear Biomedical Signals

Change detection in biomedical signals is crucial for understanding physiological processes and diagnosing medical conditions. This study evaluates various change detection methods, focusing on synthetic signals that mimic real-world scenarios. We examine the following three methods: classical statistical techniques (thresholding based on mean and standard deviation), Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification, and time–frequency analysis using Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT). Each method’s performance is assessed using synthetic signals, including nonlinear signals and those with simulated anomalies. We calculated the F1-score to quantify performance, providing a balanced measure of precision and recall. Results showed that SVM classification outperformed both classical techniques and CWT analysis, achieving a higher F1-score in detecting changes. While all methods struggled with synthetic nonlinear signals, classical techniques and SVM successfully detected changes in signals with simulated anomalies, whereas CWT had difficulty with both types of signals. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate change detection methods based on signal characteristics. Future research should explore advanced machine learning and signal processing techniques to improve detection accuracy in biomedical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Signals
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/signals5040041
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Statistical, Time–Frequency, and SVM Techniques for Change Detection in Nonlinear Biomedical Signals

Tahmineh Azizi
9 citations
Signals
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
2.12
article

Comparative Analysis of Statistical, Time–Frequency, and SVM Techniques for Change Detection in Nonlinear Biomedical Signals

Tahmineh Azizi
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Change detection in biomedical signals is crucial for understanding physiological processes and diagnosing medical conditions. This study evaluates various change detection methods, focusing on synthetic signals that mimic real-world scenarios. We examine the following three methods: classical statistical techniques (thresholding based on mean and standard deviation), Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification, and time–frequency analysis using Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT). Each method’s performance is assessed using synthetic signals, including nonlinear signals and those with simulated anomalies. We calculated the F1-score to quantify performance, providing a balanced measure of precision and recall. Results showed that SVM classification outperformed both classical techniques and CWT analysis, achieving a higher F1-score in detecting changes. While all methods struggled with synthetic nonlinear signals, classical techniques and SVM successfully detected changes in signals with simulated anomalies, whereas CWT had difficulty with both types of signals. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate change detection methods based on signal characteristics. Future research should explore advanced machine learning and signal processing techniques to improve detection accuracy in biomedical applications.

SignalsVol. 5(4)
Florida State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.