A systematic integrative review of counter-messaging communication campaigns targeting terrorism or violent extremism

In response to the rise of the so-called Islamic State and its effective use of propaganda to recruit and radicalise followers, countering the communication strategies of a range of terrorist and violent extremist actors has become a significant challenge for policymakers and practitioners. Over the past decade, counter-messaging campaigns have increasingly played a central role within Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) programming. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of these campaigns remains limited. While previous systematic reviews have focused on empirical and theoretical contributions, this paper makes a valuable contribution by conducting the first systematic review of evaluations of ‘live’ CVE counter-messaging campaigns. The study provides important insights into the effectiveness of current campaigns and offers recommendations for improving future strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2024.2419390
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic integrative review of counter-messaging communication campaigns targeting terrorism or violent extremism

Alastair Reed, Samantha Treacy, Andrew Glazzard
2 citations
Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
2.26
article

A systematic integrative review of counter-messaging communication campaigns targeting terrorism or violent extremism

Alastair Reed, Samantha Treacy, Andrew Glazzard
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In response to the rise of the so-called Islamic State and its effective use of propaganda to recruit and radicalise followers, countering the communication strategies of a range of terrorist and violent extremist actors has become a significant challenge for policymakers and practitioners. Over the past decade, counter-messaging campaigns have increasingly played a central role within Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) programming. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of these campaigns remains limited. While previous systematic reviews have focused on empirical and theoretical contributions, this paper makes a valuable contribution by conducting the first systematic review of evaluations of ‘live’ CVE counter-messaging campaigns. The study provides important insights into the effectiveness of current campaigns and offers recommendations for improving future strategies.

Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression
Swansea University (GB), Coventry University (GB)
Home Office, Swansea University, European Regional Development Fund
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.