Analysis of students’ conceptual change in learning Newton’s third law with an integrated framework of model analysis and knowledge integration

The purpose of this study is to examine how students may hold coexisting and competing conceptual ideas and how students’ uses of such ideas may evolve during the process of conceptual change by combining two complementary methods including model analysis and the conceptual framework model of knowledge integration. Conceptual change is fundamental to science learning, highlighting the processes of students’ transitions from predominantly relying on alternative views to using scientific ones. Recent studies suggest a growing consensus that alternative views and scientific conceptions coexist and compete in students’ learning. However, explicit research on how the states of coexistence and competition evolve during the process of conceptual change is underdeveloped. Building on existing research, the model analysis provides a quantitative framework to represent the different consistent and coexisting/competing states through probabilities of consistent and/or mixed (coexisting) use of incorrect and scientific ideas. Meanwhile, the conceptual framework model of knowledge integration provides content-specific, cognitive explanations for the developmental levels and processes of conceptual change from novice to expert. By combining these two methods, researchers can gain insights into how the coexistence and competition among different conceptual ideas may evolve as conceptual change progresses. To target the research goal, a model-based knowledge integration assessment of Newton’s third law is developed to measure students’ levels of knowledge integration and model states in a single test. Quantitative data were collected from Chinese high school students, supplemented by interviews with a subgroup from the same population. The model analysis results show the heterogeneity of conceptual development and the evolving competition across novice, intermediate, and expert students, as well as across different concept dimensions. The interviews provide cognitive explanations for the observed model states, framed from the lens of knowledge integration. These insights can inform the development of effective assessments and instructional strategies to facilitate favorable conceptual change in student learning. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.020141
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of students’ conceptual change in learning Newton’s third law with an integrated framework of model analysis and knowledge integration

Lei Bao, Guangtian Zhu, Yi Ding, Qiuxin Bian
6 citations
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Science Education and Pedagogy
12.58
article

Analysis of students’ conceptual change in learning Newton’s third law with an integrated framework of model analysis and knowledge integration

Lei Bao, Guangtian Zhu, Yi Ding, Qiuxin Bian
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine how students may hold coexisting and competing conceptual ideas and how students’ uses of such ideas may evolve during the process of conceptual change by combining two complementary methods including model analysis and the conceptual framework model of knowledge integration. Conceptual change is fundamental to science learning, highlighting the processes of students’ transitions from predominantly relying on alternative views to using scientific ones. Recent studies suggest a growing consensus that alternative views and scientific conceptions coexist and compete in students’ learning. However, explicit research on how the states of coexistence and competition evolve during the process of conceptual change is underdeveloped. Building on existing research, the model analysis provides a quantitative framework to represent the different consistent and coexisting/competing states through probabilities of consistent and/or mixed (coexisting) use of incorrect and scientific ideas. Meanwhile, the conceptual framework model of knowledge integration provides content-specific, cognitive explanations for the developmental levels and processes of conceptual change from novice to expert. By combining these two methods, researchers can gain insights into how the coexistence and competition among different conceptual ideas may evolve as conceptual change progresses. To target the research goal, a model-based knowledge integration assessment of Newton’s third law is developed to measure students’ levels of knowledge integration and model states in a single test. Quantitative data were collected from Chinese high school students, supplemented by interviews with a subgroup from the same population. The model analysis results show the heterogeneity of conceptual development and the evolving competition across novice, intermediate, and expert students, as well as across different concept dimensions. The interviews provide cognitive explanations for the observed model states, framed from the lens of knowledge integration. These insights can inform the development of effective assessments and instructional strategies to facilitate favorable conceptual change in student learning. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Physical Review Physics Education ResearchVol. 20(2)
Jungheinrich (Germany) (DE), Jimei University (CN), Shanghai Jinyuan Senior High School (CN), The Ohio State University (US), East China Normal University (CN)
China Scholarship Council, National Social Science Fund of China, Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Science Education and Pedagogy
12.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.