Experiences of physiotherapists working with adults living with Long COVID in Canada: a qualitative study

Objectives To explore experiences of physiotherapists working with adults living with Long COVID in Canada. Design Cross-sectional descriptive qualitative study involving online semi-structured interviews. Participants We recruited physiotherapists in Canada who self-identified as having clinically treated one or more adults living with Long COVID in the past year. Data collection Using an interview guide, we inquired about physiotherapists’ knowledge of Long COVID, assessment and treatment experiences, perspectives on physiotherapists’ roles, contextual and implementation factors influencing rehabilitative outcomes, and their recommendations for Long COVID rehabilitation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a group-based thematic analytical approach. We administered a demographic questionnaire to describe sample characteristics. Results 13 physiotherapists from five provinces participated; most were women (n=8; 62%) and practised in urban settings (n=11; 85%). Participants reported variable amounts of knowledge of existing guidelines and experiences working with adults living with Long COVID in the past year. Physiotherapists characterised their experiences working with adults living with Long COVID as a dynamic process involving: (1) a disruption to the profession (encountering a new patient population and pivoting to new models of care delivery), followed by (2) a cyclical process of learning curves and evolving roles of physiotherapists working with persons living with Long COVID (navigating uncertainty, keeping up with rapidly emerging evidence, trial and error, adapting mindset and rehabilitative approaches and growing prominence of roles as advocate and collaborator). Participants recommended the need for education and training, active and open-minded listening with patients, interdisciplinary models of care, and organisational- and system-level improvements to foster access to care. Conclusions Physiotherapists’ experiences involved a disruption to the profession followed by a dynamic process of learning curves and evolving roles in Long COVID rehabilitation. Not all participants demonstrated an in-depth understanding of existing Long COVID rehabilitation guidelines. Results may help inform physiotherapy education in Long COVID rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086357
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of physiotherapists working with adults living with Long COVID in Canada: a qualitative study

Amy Gao, Kelly K. O’Brien, Darren A. Brown, Michelle MY Wong et al.
6 citations
BMJ Open
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
2.21
article

Experiences of physiotherapists working with adults living with Long COVID in Canada: a qualitative study

Amy Gao, Kelly K. O’Brien, Darren A. Brown, Michelle MY Wong, Soo Chan Carusone, Saul Cobbing, Kiera McDuff, Nicole Kaufman, Alyssa Minor, Shahd Al Hamour Al Jarad, Chantal Lin, Caleb Kim
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Objectives To explore experiences of physiotherapists working with adults living with Long COVID in Canada. Design Cross-sectional descriptive qualitative study involving online semi-structured interviews. Participants We recruited physiotherapists in Canada who self-identified as having clinically treated one or more adults living with Long COVID in the past year. Data collection Using an interview guide, we inquired about physiotherapists’ knowledge of Long COVID, assessment and treatment experiences, perspectives on physiotherapists’ roles, contextual and implementation factors influencing rehabilitative outcomes, and their recommendations for Long COVID rehabilitation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a group-based thematic analytical approach. We administered a demographic questionnaire to describe sample characteristics. Results 13 physiotherapists from five provinces participated; most were women (n=8; 62%) and practised in urban settings (n=11; 85%). Participants reported variable amounts of knowledge of existing guidelines and experiences working with adults living with Long COVID in the past year. Physiotherapists characterised their experiences working with adults living with Long COVID as a dynamic process involving: (1) a disruption to the profession (encountering a new patient population and pivoting to new models of care delivery), followed by (2) a cyclical process of learning curves and evolving roles of physiotherapists working with persons living with Long COVID (navigating uncertainty, keeping up with rapidly emerging evidence, trial and error, adapting mindset and rehabilitative approaches and growing prominence of roles as advocate and collaborator). Participants recommended the need for education and training, active and open-minded listening with patients, interdisciplinary models of care, and organisational- and system-level improvements to foster access to care. Conclusions Physiotherapists’ experiences involved a disruption to the profession followed by a dynamic process of learning curves and evolving roles in Long COVID rehabilitation. Not all participants demonstrated an in-depth understanding of existing Long COVID rehabilitation guidelines. Results may help inform physiotherapy education in Long COVID rehabilitation.

BMJ OpenVol. 14(11)
University of Toronto (CA), Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (CA), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA), McMaster University (CA)
Canada Research Chairs, University of Toronto, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.