Exclusion Bias and the Estimation of Peer Effects

<h3>Abstract</h3> We estimate peer effects in two datasets with non-overlapping peer groups: golfers who play tournaments randomized in groups of three; and students who are randomly paired for in-class computer-assisted learning. In such data, existing instrumental variable methods to address bias in peer effect estimation do not apply. Alternative estimation methods exist that do not require instruments, but they fail to correct for one understudied but important source of bias which we call ‘exclusion bias’. We provide formulas for the magnitude of this bias when fixed effects are included at the level of selection pools. We then derive a consistent estimator that corrects for this bias and propose a simple method for testing the presence of endogenous peer effects. Using this novel method, we find positive peer effects in the first case – consistent with emulation between golfers during the tournament – and negative peer effects in the other – consistent with congestion or wasteful competition for the computer between students. These results differ markedly from existing methods in terms of magnitude, significance, and inference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Human Resources
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.1120-11337r2
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exclusion Bias and the Estimation of Peer Effects

Marcel Fafchamps, Bet Caeyers
8 citations
The Journal of Human Resources
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
4.25
article

Exclusion Bias and the Estimation of Peer Effects

Marcel Fafchamps, Bet Caeyers
article en
8 citations

Abstract

<h3>Abstract</h3> We estimate peer effects in two datasets with non-overlapping peer groups: golfers who play tournaments randomized in groups of three; and students who are randomly paired for in-class computer-assisted learning. In such data, existing instrumental variable methods to address bias in peer effect estimation do not apply. Alternative estimation methods exist that do not require instruments, but they fail to correct for one understudied but important source of bias which we call ‘exclusion bias’. We provide formulas for the magnitude of this bias when fixed effects are included at the level of selection pools. We then derive a consistent estimator that corrects for this bias and propose a simple method for testing the presence of endogenous peer effects. Using this novel method, we find positive peer effects in the first case – consistent with emulation between golfers during the tournament – and negative peer effects in the other – consistent with congestion or wasteful competition for the computer between students. These results differ markedly from existing methods in terms of magnitude, significance, and inference.

The Journal of Human Resources
Center for Economic and Policy Research (US), Chr. Michelsen Institute (NO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
4.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.