An Indigenous Right to Be Heard on the International Stage?

In the early 20th century, Indigenous peoples were effectively locked out of international organisations. In Self-Determination As Voice, a hugely valuable work of scholarship, Natalie Jones surveys the extent to which that has changed. Mechanisms for Indigenous participation in the United Nations and other organisations have proliferated since the creation of the Working Group on Indigenous Populations in 1982 and especially since the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples of 2007. Jones concludes that it is arguable that there is now sufficient practice and opinio iuris to evidence a rule of customary international law about Indigenous participation in international governance. In this review essay, it is suggested that some might not fully agree with her analysis, either because they are more doubtful about the opinio iuris or because they place more weight on the practice of economic organisations and treaties that continue to exclude Indigenous peoples. But in any case the book identifies an accelerating trend. It also raises challenging questions about the role of soft law and how much it differs from international law in the strict sense.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œSydney law review.
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30722/slr.20333
Primary Topic
Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Indigenous Right to Be Heard on the International Stage?

Rowan Nicholson
˜The œSydney law review.
Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
article

An Indigenous Right to Be Heard on the International Stage?

Rowan Nicholson
article en

Abstract

In the early 20th century, Indigenous peoples were effectively locked out of international organisations. In Self-Determination As Voice, a hugely valuable work of scholarship, Natalie Jones surveys the extent to which that has changed. Mechanisms for Indigenous participation in the United Nations and other organisations have proliferated since the creation of the Working Group on Indigenous Populations in 1982 and especially since the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples of 2007. Jones concludes that it is arguable that there is now sufficient practice and opinio iuris to evidence a rule of customary international law about Indigenous participation in international governance. In this review essay, it is suggested that some might not fully agree with her analysis, either because they are more doubtful about the opinio iuris or because they place more weight on the practice of economic organisations and treaties that continue to exclude Indigenous peoples. But in any case the book identifies an accelerating trend. It also raises challenging questions about the role of soft law and how much it differs from international law in the strict sense.

˜The œSydney law review.Vol. 46(3)
Flinders University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Indigenous Right to Be Heard on the International Stage? — Rowan Nicholson · ˜The œSydney law review. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS