Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacokinetics of a New Preservative-Free Bimatoprost 0.01% Ophthalmic Gel to Treat Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Pharmacokinetic evaluation of ocular penetration and systemic accumulation of preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic gel (PFB 0.01% gel). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In a preclinical study, pigmented rabbits received a single ocular administration of PFB 0.01% gel (<i>N</i> = 15) or preserved bimatoprost 0.01% or 0.03% ophthalmic solution [PB 0.01% (<i>N</i> = 15) or PB 0.03% (<i>N</i> = 15)]. The aqueous humor, iris, and ciliary body were analyzed for bimatoprost+bimatoprost free acid. In a Phase 1, randomized, open-label clinical study, healthy participants received PFB 0.01% gel (<i>N</i> = 20) or PB 0.01% (<i>N</i> = 20) daily in each eye (Days 1-15). Bimatoprost levels in human plasma were analyzed on Days 1 and 15. All serological analyses used validated methods. Adverse events were collected throughout and ocular assessments were performed on Days 1 and 15. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the preclinical study, Cmax (bimatoprost+bimatoprost free acid) for PFB 0.01% gel, PB 0.01%, and PB 0.03% was 50.2, 26.3, and 59.9 ng/mL; AUC<sub>0.5-8 h</sub> was 134.0 ng·h/mL, 67.0 ng·h/mL, and 148.0 ng·h/mL. In the clinical study, systemic exposure to bimatoprost (AUC<sub>0-last</sub>) on Days 1 and 15 was lower for PFB 0.01% gel (0.5248 and 0.5645 ng·min/mL) than PB 0.01% (0.8461 and 0.7551 ng·min/mL), with no systemic accumulation of bimatoprost in either group. There were no clinically important differences between groups in ocular or systemic tolerability in the clinical study and no serious adverse events. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> PFB 0.01% gel showed improved ocular penetration compared with PB 0.01%. Systemic absorption was comparable, with a favorable clinical safety profile, supporting PFB 0.01% gel as a potential treatment for glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2024.0092
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacokinetics of a New Preservative-Free Bimatoprost 0.01% Ophthalmic Gel to Treat Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension

Hari Jayaram, Carl Erb, Fotis Topouzis, Ingeborg Stalmans et al.
3 citations
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
1.62
article

Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacokinetics of a New Preservative-Free Bimatoprost 0.01% Ophthalmic Gel to Treat Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension

Hari Jayaram, Carl Erb, Fotis Topouzis, Ingeborg Stalmans, Francisco J. Muñoz‐Negrete, Fanny Allan, Sylvie Nisslé
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Pharmacokinetic evaluation of ocular penetration and systemic accumulation of preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic gel (PFB 0.01% gel). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In a preclinical study, pigmented rabbits received a single ocular administration of PFB 0.01% gel (<i>N</i> = 15) or preserved bimatoprost 0.01% or 0.03% ophthalmic solution [PB 0.01% (<i>N</i> = 15) or PB 0.03% (<i>N</i> = 15)]. The aqueous humor, iris, and ciliary body were analyzed for bimatoprost+bimatoprost free acid. In a Phase 1, randomized, open-label clinical study, healthy participants received PFB 0.01% gel (<i>N</i> = 20) or PB 0.01% (<i>N</i> = 20) daily in each eye (Days 1-15). Bimatoprost levels in human plasma were analyzed on Days 1 and 15. All serological analyses used validated methods. Adverse events were collected throughout and ocular assessments were performed on Days 1 and 15. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the preclinical study, Cmax (bimatoprost+bimatoprost free acid) for PFB 0.01% gel, PB 0.01%, and PB 0.03% was 50.2, 26.3, and 59.9 ng/mL; AUC<sub>0.5-8 h</sub> was 134.0 ng·h/mL, 67.0 ng·h/mL, and 148.0 ng·h/mL. In the clinical study, systemic exposure to bimatoprost (AUC<sub>0-last</sub>) on Days 1 and 15 was lower for PFB 0.01% gel (0.5248 and 0.5645 ng·min/mL) than PB 0.01% (0.8461 and 0.7551 ng·min/mL), with no systemic accumulation of bimatoprost in either group. There were no clinically important differences between groups in ocular or systemic tolerability in the clinical study and no serious adverse events. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> PFB 0.01% gel showed improved ocular penetration compared with PB 0.01%. Systemic absorption was comparable, with a favorable clinical safety profile, supporting PFB 0.01% gel as a potential treatment for glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and TherapeuticsVol. 41(1)
Universidad de Alcalá (ES), Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE), AHEPA University Hospital (GR), Institut für Hochschulforschung (DE), Moorfields Eye Hospital (GB), Thea (France) (FR), Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES), University College London (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
1.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.