Guardians at the Gates: Poll Worker Retention in a Challenging Election Environment

Contrary to previous research and press accounts, we find limited evidence that persons who worked the polls in the past, including the 2020 election, are reticent to work in future elections. Our explanation focuses on the motivation and affect persons need to have to work the polls. Persons who believe their work at the polls is consequential for their community and who feel their work is valued, respected, and well-supported are highly motivated to work the polls in future elections. Conflict at the polls with voters and poll watchers, aspects of poll worker training, and collaborations with other poll workers have no appreciable impact on the willingness to work the polls. Only the magnitude and diversity of problems poll workers observed voters had casting their ballots are significant deterrents to working the polls. Our findings identify efficacious steps that local election officials can take to recruit and retain persons to work the polls in future elections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2024.0017
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guardians at the Gates: Poll Worker Retention in a Challenging Election Environment

David C. Kimball, Michael D. Gilbert, Costas Panagopoulos, Rachael Cobb et al.
3 citations
Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy
Public Policy and Administration Research
2.57
article

Guardians at the Gates: Poll Worker Retention in a Challenging Election Environment

David C. Kimball, Michael D. Gilbert, Costas Panagopoulos, Rachael Cobb, Lisa Bryant, Andrew Reeves, Joshua D. Hostetter, Kenneth Hugh Mayer, Jennifer Nicoll Victor, Gayle Alberda, Lonna Rae Atkeson, Corwin D. Smidt, Barry C. Burden, Matt Lamb, Robert M. Stein
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Contrary to previous research and press accounts, we find limited evidence that persons who worked the polls in the past, including the 2020 election, are reticent to work in future elections. Our explanation focuses on the motivation and affect persons need to have to work the polls. Persons who believe their work at the polls is consequential for their community and who feel their work is valued, respected, and well-supported are highly motivated to work the polls in future elections. Conflict at the polls with voters and poll watchers, aspects of poll worker training, and collaborations with other poll workers have no appreciable impact on the willingness to work the polls. Only the magnitude and diversity of problems poll workers observed voters had casting their ballots are significant deterrents to working the polls. Our findings identify efficacious steps that local election officials can take to recruit and retain persons to work the polls in future elections.

Election Law Journal Rules Politics and PolicyVol. 24(1)
Florida State University (US), Texas Tech University (US), Fairfield University (US), Northeastern University (US), University of Wisconsin System (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), George Mason University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Missouri–St. Louis (US), Suffolk University (US), State University System of Florida (US), California State University, Fresno (US), Rice University (US), Virginia Tech (US), Michigan State University (US), Citadel (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Public Policy and Administration Research
2.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.