Cooperation in temporary partnerships

The literature on cooperation in infinitely repeated Prisoner's Dilemmas covers the extreme opposites of the matching spectrum: partners , a player's opponent never changes, and strangers , a player's opponent randomly changes in every period. Here, we extend the analysis to settings where the opponent changes, but not in every period. In these temporary partnerships, players can deter some deviations by directly sanctioning their partner. Hence, relaxing the extreme assumption of one-period matchings can support some cooperation also off equilibrium because a class of strategies emerges that are less extreme than the typical “grim” strategy. We establish conditions supporting full cooperation as a subgame perfect equilibrium under a social norm that complements direct sanctions with a cyclical community sanction. Though this strategy less effectively incentivizes cooperation, it more effectively incentivizes punishment after a deviation, hence, can be preferable to the grim strategy under certain conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2024.104987
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cooperation in temporary partnerships

Alessandro Gioffré, Gabriele Camera
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Cooperation in temporary partnerships

Alessandro Gioffré, Gabriele Camera
article en

Abstract

The literature on cooperation in infinitely repeated Prisoner's Dilemmas covers the extreme opposites of the matching spectrum: partners , a player's opponent never changes, and strangers , a player's opponent randomly changes in every period. Here, we extend the analysis to settings where the opponent changes, but not in every period. In these temporary partnerships, players can deter some deviations by directly sanctioning their partner. Hence, relaxing the extreme assumption of one-period matchings can support some cooperation also off equilibrium because a class of strategies emerges that are less extreme than the typical “grim” strategy. We establish conditions supporting full cooperation as a subgame perfect equilibrium under a social norm that complements direct sanctions with a cyclical community sanction. Though this strategy less effectively incentivizes cooperation, it more effectively incentivizes punishment after a deviation, hence, can be preferable to the grim strategy under certain conditions.

Journal of Economic Dynamics and ControlVol. 172
Chapman University (US), University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cooperation in temporary partnerships — Alessandro Gioffré, Gabriele Camera · Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS