Clinical Data Standards and Data Anonymization Considerations for Academic Organizations: International Cross-Sectional Survey

Introduction: Clinical Data Management (CDM) is a critical aspect of clinical research, and the use of clinical data standards is essential to ensure the quality and consistency of one’s data. Objectives: We aim to obtain a snapshot of practice patterns among CDM professionals at academic institutions regarding the implementation and use of clinical data standards. Methods: A survey of 14 questions on clinical data standards and anonymization was sent to over 300 academic clinical institutions worldwide. Data were obtained from a total of 50 institutions. Results: Sixty-six percent of institutions reported implementing data standards while only 22% of reporting institutions offered data standards training and 20% offered training in anonymization. The findings presented here will be useful to research administrators striving to improve upon and streamline the use, implementation, and training of clinical data standards in academic research today.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47912/jscdm.368
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Data Standards and Data Anonymization Considerations for Academic Organizations: International Cross-Sectional Survey

Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management
Intellectual Property Law
article

Clinical Data Standards and Data Anonymization Considerations for Academic Organizations: International Cross-Sectional Survey

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical Data Management (CDM) is a critical aspect of clinical research, and the use of clinical data standards is essential to ensure the quality and consistency of one’s data. Objectives: We aim to obtain a snapshot of practice patterns among CDM professionals at academic institutions regarding the implementation and use of clinical data standards. Methods: A survey of 14 questions on clinical data standards and anonymization was sent to over 300 academic clinical institutions worldwide. Data were obtained from a total of 50 institutions. Results: Sixty-six percent of institutions reported implementing data standards while only 22% of reporting institutions offered data standards training and 20% offered training in anonymization. The findings presented here will be useful to research administrators striving to improve upon and streamline the use, implementation, and training of clinical data standards in academic research today.

Journal of the Society for Clinical Data ManagementVol. 6(1)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Gritman Medical Center (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Alzheimer’s Research UK (GB), Advicenne Pharma (France) (FR), Data Management (Italy) (IT), The University of Tokyo (JP), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Intellectual Property Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinical Data Standards and Data Anonymization Considerations for Academic Organizations: International Cross-Sectional Survey · Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS