Balanced Splitting: A Framework for Achieving Zero-Wait in the Multiserver-Job Model

We present a new framework for designing nonpreemptive and job-size oblivious scheduling policies in the multiserver-job queueing model. The main requirement is to identify a <i>static and balanced sub-partition</i> of the server set and ensure that the servers in each set of that sub-partition can only handle jobs of a given <i>class</i> and in a first-come first-served order. A job class is determined by the number of servers to which it has exclusive access during its entire execution and the probability distribution of its service time. This approach aims to reduce delays by preventing small jobs from being blocked by larger ones that arrived first, and it is particularly beneficial when the job size variability intra resp. inter classes is small resp. large. In this setting, we propose a new scheduling policy, Balanced-Splitting. In our main results, we provide a sufficient condition for the stability of Balanced-Splitting and show that the resulting queueing probability, i.e., the probability that an arriving job needs to wait for processing upon arrival, vanishes in both the subcritical (the load is kept fixed to a constant less than one) and critical (the load approaches one from below) many-server limiting regimes. Crucial to our analysis is a connection with the M/GI/<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$s$</tex-math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$s$</tex-math></inline-formula> queue and Erlang’s loss formula, which allows our analysis to rely on fundamental results from queueing theory. Numerical simulations show that the proposed policy performs better than several preemptive/nonpreemptive size-aware/oblivious policies in various practical scenarios. This is also confirmed by simulations running on real traces from High Performance Computing (HPC) workloads. The delays induced by Balanced-Splitting are also competitive with those induced by state-of-the-art policies such as First-Fit-SRPT and ServerFilling-SRPT, though our approach has the advantage of not requiring preemption, nor the knowledge of job sizes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tpds.2024.3493631
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balanced Splitting: A Framework for Achieving Zero-Wait in the Multiserver-Job Model

Jonatha Anselmi, Josu Doncel
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis
1.06
article

Balanced Splitting: A Framework for Achieving Zero-Wait in the Multiserver-Job Model

Jonatha Anselmi, Josu Doncel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We present a new framework for designing nonpreemptive and job-size oblivious scheduling policies in the multiserver-job queueing model. The main requirement is to identify a <i>static and balanced sub-partition</i> of the server set and ensure that the servers in each set of that sub-partition can only handle jobs of a given <i>class</i> and in a first-come first-served order. A job class is determined by the number of servers to which it has exclusive access during its entire execution and the probability distribution of its service time. This approach aims to reduce delays by preventing small jobs from being blocked by larger ones that arrived first, and it is particularly beneficial when the job size variability intra resp. inter classes is small resp. large. In this setting, we propose a new scheduling policy, Balanced-Splitting. In our main results, we provide a sufficient condition for the stability of Balanced-Splitting and show that the resulting queueing probability, i.e., the probability that an arriving job needs to wait for processing upon arrival, vanishes in both the subcritical (the load is kept fixed to a constant less than one) and critical (the load approaches one from below) many-server limiting regimes. Crucial to our analysis is a connection with the M/GI/<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$s$</tex-math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$s$</tex-math></inline-formula> queue and Erlang’s loss formula, which allows our analysis to rely on fundamental results from queueing theory. Numerical simulations show that the proposed policy performs better than several preemptive/nonpreemptive size-aware/oblivious policies in various practical scenarios. This is also confirmed by simulations running on real traces from High Performance Computing (HPC) workloads. The delays induced by Balanced-Splitting are also competitive with those induced by state-of-the-art policies such as First-Fit-SRPT and ServerFilling-SRPT, though our approach has the advantage of not requiring preemption, nor the knowledge of job sizes.

IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed SystemsVol. 36(1)
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of the Basque Country (ES), Centre Inria de l'Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble (FR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.