Stories From Near and Far: Evaluating Kindergarten-Age Students' Performance on Narrative Tasks Administered In-Person and Remotely

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the difference in performance on Narrative Language Measures-Listening (NLM-Listening; Petersen & Spencer, 2016) when administered via telepractice versus in-person for typically developing kindergarten-age participants. Method: Twenty-four typically developing kindergarten-age students were administered the NLM-Listening in-person and via telepractice as part of a kindergarten screening process. Raw scores earned on the assessments were compared using a quasi-experimental, repeated-measures design. Administration time was also compared between the two conditions as a primary variable. Scores from behavioral checklists examining student performance were compared to determine reliability between telepractice and in-person delivery. Results: No statistically significant differences were noted for the assessment between telepractice and in-person in terms of raw scores earned or administration time. Results from analysis of the behavioral checklist suggest that student behavior was similar across the two testing conditions. Conclusions: The current study contributes to the existing research between in-person and telepractice assessment. Results demonstrate that typically developing students performed similarly between the two testing conditions in terms of raw scores earned on the narrative assessment, time to complete the assessment, and behavioral ratings on a clinician checklist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-24-00045
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stories From Near and Far: Evaluating Kindergarten-Age Students' Performance on Narrative Tasks Administered In-Person and Remotely

Jason Schenker, Hayley S. Arnold, Sue Grogan-Johnson, Lisa R. Audet et al.
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Early Childhood Education and Development
article

Stories From Near and Far: Evaluating Kindergarten-Age Students' Performance on Narrative Tasks Administered In-Person and Remotely

Jason Schenker, Hayley S. Arnold, Sue Grogan-Johnson, Lisa R. Audet, William Bolden
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the difference in performance on Narrative Language Measures-Listening (NLM-Listening; Petersen & Spencer, 2016) when administered via telepractice versus in-person for typically developing kindergarten-age participants. Method: Twenty-four typically developing kindergarten-age students were administered the NLM-Listening in-person and via telepractice as part of a kindergarten screening process. Raw scores earned on the assessments were compared using a quasi-experimental, repeated-measures design. Administration time was also compared between the two conditions as a primary variable. Scores from behavioral checklists examining student performance were compared to determine reliability between telepractice and in-person delivery. Results: No statistically significant differences were noted for the assessment between telepractice and in-person in terms of raw scores earned or administration time. Results from analysis of the behavioral checklist suggest that student behavior was similar across the two testing conditions. Conclusions: The current study contributes to the existing research between in-person and telepractice assessment. Results demonstrate that typically developing students performed similarly between the two testing conditions in terms of raw scores earned on the narrative assessment, time to complete the assessment, and behavioral ratings on a clinician checklist.

Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest GroupsVol. 9(6)
Kent State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Early Childhood Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.