Fully-relativistic electron Bernstein wave current drive simulations in the STEP spherical tokamak

Abstract Electron Bernstein waves (EBWs) are theorised to efficiently drive current in spherical tokamak power plants, e.g. Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP). At high temperatures ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>≳</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"/> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> keV), relativistic effects can significantly impact wave propagation. This work presents relativistic calculations of EBW wave propagation, damping, and current drive (CD) in a conceptual STEP plasma. Kramers–Kronig relations are exploited to efficiently evaluate the fully-relativistic dispersion relation for arbitrary wave-vectors, leading to a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"/> <mml:mn>50</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> speed-up compared to previous efforts. CD efficiency is calculated using both linear and quasilinear codes. Thus, for the first time, large parametric scans of fully-relativistic EBW CD simulations are performed through ray-tracing. In STEP, three main classes of rays are identified. The first class propagate deep into the core ( ρ &lt; 0.5), but exist only if relativistic effects are accounted for. They damp strongly at the fundamental harmonic on nearly-thermal electrons and thus drive little current. A second class of rays propagate to intermediate depths ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≈</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) before damping at the 2nd harmonic. Their CD efficiencies are significantly altered due to relativistic changes to trajectory and polarisation. The third class of rays damp strongly far off-axis ( ρ &gt; 0.7), predominantly at the second harmonic. These ray trajectories are sufficiently short and ‘cold’ that relativistic effects are unimportant. In linear CD simulations, the optimal launch point corresponds to this third class of rays, suggesting that non-relativistic simulations are adequate. However, quasilinear calculations indicate that, at reactor relevant powers, CD is maximised at ρ ≈ 0.6. This quasilinear optimal point corresponds to the second class of rays, for which relativistic propagation does matter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Fusion
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad8fbc
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fully-relativistic electron Bernstein wave current drive simulations in the STEP spherical tokamak

R. G. L. Vann, S. J. Freethy, Bodhi Biswas
3 citations
Nuclear Fusion
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.98
article

Fully-relativistic electron Bernstein wave current drive simulations in the STEP spherical tokamak

R. G. L. Vann, S. J. Freethy, Bodhi Biswas
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Electron Bernstein waves (EBWs) are theorised to efficiently drive current in spherical tokamak power plants, e.g. Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP). At high temperatures ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>≳</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"/> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> keV), relativistic effects can significantly impact wave propagation. This work presents relativistic calculations of EBW wave propagation, damping, and current drive (CD) in a conceptual STEP plasma. Kramers–Kronig relations are exploited to efficiently evaluate the fully-relativistic dispersion relation for arbitrary wave-vectors, leading to a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"/> <mml:mn>50</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> speed-up compared to previous efforts. CD efficiency is calculated using both linear and quasilinear codes. Thus, for the first time, large parametric scans of fully-relativistic EBW CD simulations are performed through ray-tracing. In STEP, three main classes of rays are identified. The first class propagate deep into the core ( ρ &lt; 0.5), but exist only if relativistic effects are accounted for. They damp strongly at the fundamental harmonic on nearly-thermal electrons and thus drive little current. A second class of rays propagate to intermediate depths ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≈</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) before damping at the 2nd harmonic. Their CD efficiencies are significantly altered due to relativistic changes to trajectory and polarisation. The third class of rays damp strongly far off-axis ( ρ &gt; 0.7), predominantly at the second harmonic. These ray trajectories are sufficiently short and ‘cold’ that relativistic effects are unimportant. In linear CD simulations, the optimal launch point corresponds to this third class of rays, suggesting that non-relativistic simulations are adequate. However, quasilinear calculations indicate that, at reactor relevant powers, CD is maximised at ρ ≈ 0.6. This quasilinear optimal point corresponds to the second class of rays, for which relativistic propagation does matter.

Nuclear FusionVol. 65(1)
Culham Science Centre (GB), University of York (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.