Ex vivo validation of non-invasive phase correction for transspine focused ultrasound: model performance and target feasibility

<i>Objective.</i>To evaluate the feasibility of transspine focused ultrasound using simulation-based phase corrections from a CT-derived ray acoustics model.<i>Approach.</i>Bilateral transspine focusing was performed in<i>ex vivo</i>human vertebrae with a spine-specific ultrasound array. Ray acoustics-derived phase correction was compared to geometric focusing and a hydrophone-corrected gold standard. Planar hydrophone scans were recorded in the spinal canal and three metrics were calculated: target pressure, coronal and sagittal focal shift, and coronal and sagittal Sørensen-Dice similarity to the free-field.<i>Post hoc</i>analysis was performed<i>in silico</i>to assess the impact of windows between vertebrae on focal shift.<i>Main results.</i>Hydrophone correction reduced mean sagittal plane shift from 1.74 ± 0.82 mm to 1.40 ± 0.82 mm and mean coronal plane shift from 1.07 ± 0.63 mm to 0.54 ± 0.49 mm. Ray acoustics correction reduced mean sagittal plane and coronal plane shift to 1.63 ± 0.83 mm and 0.83 ± 0.60 mm, respectively. Hydrophone correction increased mean sagittal similarity from 0.48 ± 0.22 to 0.68 ± 0.19 and mean coronal similarity from 0.48 ± 0.23 to 0.70 ± 0.19. Ray acoustics correction increased mean sagittal and coronal similarity to 0.53 ± 0.25 and 0.55 ± 0.26, respectively. Target pressure was relatively unchanged across beamforming methods.<i>In silico</i>analysis found that, for some targets, unoccluded paths may have increased focal shift.<i>Significance</i>. Gold standard phase correction significantly reduced coronal shift and significantly increased sagittal and coronal Sørensen-Dice similarity (<i>p</i>< 0.05). Ray acoustics-derived phase correction reduced sagittal and coronal shift and increased sagittal and coronal similarity but did not achieve statistical significance. Across beamforming methods, mean focal shift was comparable to MRI resolution, suggesting that transspine focusing is possible with minimal correction in favourable targets. Future work will explore the mitigation of acoustic windows with anti-focus control points.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8fed
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ex vivo validation of non-invasive phase correction for transspine focused ultrasound: model performance and target feasibility

Martin Dreßler, Meaghan A. O’Reilly, Rui Xu, David Martín
6 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
2.43
article

Ex vivo validation of non-invasive phase correction for transspine focused ultrasound: model performance and target feasibility

Martin Dreßler, Meaghan A. O’Reilly, Rui Xu, David Martín
article en
6 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>To evaluate the feasibility of transspine focused ultrasound using simulation-based phase corrections from a CT-derived ray acoustics model.<i>Approach.</i>Bilateral transspine focusing was performed in<i>ex vivo</i>human vertebrae with a spine-specific ultrasound array. Ray acoustics-derived phase correction was compared to geometric focusing and a hydrophone-corrected gold standard. Planar hydrophone scans were recorded in the spinal canal and three metrics were calculated: target pressure, coronal and sagittal focal shift, and coronal and sagittal Sørensen-Dice similarity to the free-field.<i>Post hoc</i>analysis was performed<i>in silico</i>to assess the impact of windows between vertebrae on focal shift.<i>Main results.</i>Hydrophone correction reduced mean sagittal plane shift from 1.74 ± 0.82 mm to 1.40 ± 0.82 mm and mean coronal plane shift from 1.07 ± 0.63 mm to 0.54 ± 0.49 mm. Ray acoustics correction reduced mean sagittal plane and coronal plane shift to 1.63 ± 0.83 mm and 0.83 ± 0.60 mm, respectively. Hydrophone correction increased mean sagittal similarity from 0.48 ± 0.22 to 0.68 ± 0.19 and mean coronal similarity from 0.48 ± 0.23 to 0.70 ± 0.19. Ray acoustics correction increased mean sagittal and coronal similarity to 0.53 ± 0.25 and 0.55 ± 0.26, respectively. Target pressure was relatively unchanged across beamforming methods.<i>In silico</i>analysis found that, for some targets, unoccluded paths may have increased focal shift.<i>Significance</i>. Gold standard phase correction significantly reduced coronal shift and significantly increased sagittal and coronal Sørensen-Dice similarity (<i>p</i>< 0.05). Ray acoustics-derived phase correction reduced sagittal and coronal shift and increased sagittal and coronal similarity but did not achieve statistical significance. Across beamforming methods, mean focal shift was comparable to MRI resolution, suggesting that transspine focusing is possible with minimal correction in favourable targets. Future work will explore the mitigation of acoustic windows with anti-focus control points.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 69(23)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Sunnybrook Research Institute
Canada Foundation for Innovation, Canada Research Chairs, Terry Fox Research Institute, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
2.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.