Effects of spot size errors in DynamicARC pencil beam scanning proton therapy planning

<i>Objective.</i>Spot size stability is crucial in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy, and variations in spot size can disrupt dose distributions. Recently, a novel proton beam delivery method known as DynamicARC PBS scanning has been introduced. The current study investigates the dosimetric impact of spot size errors in DynamicARC proton therapy for head and neck (HNC), prostate, and lung cancers.<i>Approach.</i>Robustly optimized DynamicARC proton therapy plans were created for HNC (<i>n</i>= 4), prostate (<i>n</i>= 4), and lung (<i>n</i>= 4) cancer patients. Spot size errors of ±10%, ±15%, and ±20% were introduced, and their effects on target coverage (<i>D</i><sub>95%</sub>and<i>D</i><sub>99%</sub>), homogeneity index (HI), and organ-at-risk doses were analyzed across different cancer sites.<i>Main Results.</i>HNC and lung cancer plans showed greater vulnerability to spot size errors, with reductions in target coverage of up to 4.8% under -20% spot size errors. Dose homogeneity was also more affected in these cases, with HI degrading by 0.12 in lung cancer. Prostate cancer demonstrated greater resilience to spot size variations, even under errors of ±20%. For spot size errors ±10%, the oral cavity, parotid glands, and constrictor muscles experienced<i>D</i><sub>mean</sub>deviations within ±1.2%, while deviations were limited to ±0.5% for<i>D</i><sub>10%</sub>of the bladder and rectum and ±0.3% for<i>V</i><sub>20 Gy(RBE)</sub>of the lungs. The robustness analysis indicated that lung cancer plans were most susceptible to robustness reductions caused by spot size errors, while HNC plans demonstrated moderate sensitivity. Conversely, prostate cancer plans demonstrated high robustness, experiencing only minimal reductions in target coverage.<i>Significance.</i>While the ±10% spot size tolerance is appropriate in majority of the cases, lung cancer plans may require more stringent criteria. As DynamicARC becomes clinically available, measuring spot size errors in practice will be essential to validate these findings and refine tolerance thresholds for clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8feb
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of spot size errors in DynamicARC pencil beam scanning proton therapy planning

Anatoly Rosenfeld, Suresh Rana
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Effects of spot size errors in DynamicARC pencil beam scanning proton therapy planning

Anatoly Rosenfeld, Suresh Rana
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Spot size stability is crucial in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy, and variations in spot size can disrupt dose distributions. Recently, a novel proton beam delivery method known as DynamicARC PBS scanning has been introduced. The current study investigates the dosimetric impact of spot size errors in DynamicARC proton therapy for head and neck (HNC), prostate, and lung cancers.<i>Approach.</i>Robustly optimized DynamicARC proton therapy plans were created for HNC (<i>n</i>= 4), prostate (<i>n</i>= 4), and lung (<i>n</i>= 4) cancer patients. Spot size errors of ±10%, ±15%, and ±20% were introduced, and their effects on target coverage (<i>D</i><sub>95%</sub>and<i>D</i><sub>99%</sub>), homogeneity index (HI), and organ-at-risk doses were analyzed across different cancer sites.<i>Main Results.</i>HNC and lung cancer plans showed greater vulnerability to spot size errors, with reductions in target coverage of up to 4.8% under -20% spot size errors. Dose homogeneity was also more affected in these cases, with HI degrading by 0.12 in lung cancer. Prostate cancer demonstrated greater resilience to spot size variations, even under errors of ±20%. For spot size errors ±10%, the oral cavity, parotid glands, and constrictor muscles experienced<i>D</i><sub>mean</sub>deviations within ±1.2%, while deviations were limited to ±0.5% for<i>D</i><sub>10%</sub>of the bladder and rectum and ±0.3% for<i>V</i><sub>20 Gy(RBE)</sub>of the lungs. The robustness analysis indicated that lung cancer plans were most susceptible to robustness reductions caused by spot size errors, while HNC plans demonstrated moderate sensitivity. Conversely, prostate cancer plans demonstrated high robustness, experiencing only minimal reductions in target coverage.<i>Significance.</i>While the ±10% spot size tolerance is appropriate in majority of the cases, lung cancer plans may require more stringent criteria. As DynamicARC becomes clinically available, measuring spot size errors in practice will be essential to validate these findings and refine tolerance thresholds for clinical use.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 69(23)
University of Wollongong (AU), Boca Raton Regional Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.