Effect of vegetation die‐back on genetic diversity in large‐scale restored <i>Spartina alterniflora</i> marshes and comparison to native marshes in the Chesapeake Bay, USA

Tidal marshes at the Paul S. Sarbanes Ecosystem Restoration Project at Poplar Island (PI) are part of a large‐scale restoration project to replace lost island habitat in Chesapeake Bay, United States. However, observations of Spartina alterniflora die‐back prompted questions about the impact on genetic diversity and resilience of restored versus natural marshes, leading to an investigation of genetic diversity and population structure. Transects were established across three distinct restored marshes with different ages and histories of die‐back and across two local, non‐restored native marshes. Plants were genotyped at eight microsatellite markers to examine metrics of genetic diversity, population structure, and clonality. Allelic richness but not heterozygosity was higher in restored marshes compared to reference marshes, which showed significantly higher clonality and spatial genetic autocorrelation. Restored marsh areas experiencing die‐back had slightly lower multilocus diversity indices than non‐die back areas in two cases, but not a third comparison. Significant genetic differentiation was observed between the native and restored marshes (mean G ST approximately 0.06), which reflects the approximately 100 km distance between native marshes and restored seed source in New Jersey. Overall, die‐back in restored marshes did not substantially affect genetic diversity or composition, but substantial differences in diversity were observed between restored and native marshes. Reduced clonal diversity in mature, native marshes may be a function of their greater age, as has been reported elsewhere. Future monitoring of neutral genetic diversity in PI marshes will be useful for understanding longer‐term patterns of genetic change and diversity in planted, restored marshes.