A Typology of Authorship

Abstract The growing share of self-publishing titles on the book market has sparked debates about their position within the literary sphere. Although some consider self-publishing to be a parallel universe in its own right, our understanding of self-publishing’s links to traditional structures is still evolving. This study showcases three distinct types of perspectives. The first type strategically utilizes self-publishing to build authorial renown and increase their likelihood of securing a contract with a royalty publisher. The second type makes use of self-publishing to measure the quality of authors’ work, assessing the work’s popularity with readers and comparing its quality with that of competing authors and titles. Finally, the third type sees self-publishing as a way to preserve creative autonomy and self-determined authorial work. Drawing further on the broader sociocultural context of these findings, the research contributes to our understanding of self-publishing’s diverse landscape as well as its implications for the contemporary literary sphere.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Logos
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18784712-20240008
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Typology of Authorship

Madeleine Span
Logos
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

A Typology of Authorship

Madeleine Span
article en

Abstract

Abstract The growing share of self-publishing titles on the book market has sparked debates about their position within the literary sphere. Although some consider self-publishing to be a parallel universe in its own right, our understanding of self-publishing’s links to traditional structures is still evolving. This study showcases three distinct types of perspectives. The first type strategically utilizes self-publishing to build authorial renown and increase their likelihood of securing a contract with a royalty publisher. The second type makes use of self-publishing to measure the quality of authors’ work, assessing the work’s popularity with readers and comparing its quality with that of competing authors and titles. Finally, the third type sees self-publishing as a way to preserve creative autonomy and self-determined authorial work. Drawing further on the broader sociocultural context of these findings, the research contributes to our understanding of self-publishing’s diverse landscape as well as its implications for the contemporary literary sphere.

LogosVol. 35(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.