Combined spinal‐epidural vs. dural puncture epidural techniques for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial*

There were no significant differences in the quality of labour analgesia following initiation of a combined spinal-epidural compared with a dural puncture epidural technique.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anaesthesia
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16433
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combined spinal‐epidural vs. dural puncture epidural techniques for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial*

Hannah Zang, Ashraf S. Habib, Samantha M. Rubright, Amanda M. Craig et al.
18 citations
Anaesthesia
Anesthesia and Pain Management
10.31
article

Combined spinal‐epidural vs. dural puncture epidural techniques for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial*

Hannah Zang, Ashraf S. Habib, Samantha M. Rubright, Amanda M. Craig, Matthew Fuller, Trung Pham, A. Padilla
article en
18 citations

Abstract

There were no significant differences in the quality of labour analgesia following initiation of a combined spinal-epidural compared with a dural puncture epidural technique.

AnaesthesiaVol. 80(1)
Duke University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
10.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.