Cross‐group contact predicts positive beliefs about girls’ and Black peers’ STEM abilities and occupational prospects

High-quality forms of contact, such as cross-group play and friendships, have been identified as particularly effective for promoting positive beliefs toward outgroup peers. Relations between children's cross-group play experiences and their beliefs about peers' math and science competencies and high-status occupational prospects have not yet been examined. Understanding these relations is important given that children from minoritized groups continue to face exclusion and bias in these domains. The present study examined the associations between children's (<i>N</i> = 983, <i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 9.64, <i>SD</i> <sub>age</sub> = .89) reported cross-group play experiences and their math and science competency beliefs and high-status occupation expectations about girls and Black peers. Results revealed that, for majority group participants (i.e., boys and White children), higher levels of cross-group play were associated with significantly higher beliefs and expectations for girls and Black peers. Further, results demonstrated contexts in which higher levels of cross-group play were positively associated with girls' and Black children's beliefs and expectations for their own groups. Together, these findings advance theory and research on the benefits of cross-group contact in childhood by highlighting novel outcomes to which cross-group contact is positively related, as well as by showing that children from both minoritized and majority status groups stand to benefit from cross-group contact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Development
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12776
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross‐group contact predicts positive beliefs about girls’ and Black peers’ STEM abilities and occupational prospects

Marley B. Forbes, Elise M. Kaufman, Melanie Killen, Jonquil Rumberger
2 citations
Social Development
Career Development and Diversity
1.05
article

Cross‐group contact predicts positive beliefs about girls’ and Black peers’ STEM abilities and occupational prospects

Marley B. Forbes, Elise M. Kaufman, Melanie Killen, Jonquil Rumberger
article en
2 citations

Abstract

High-quality forms of contact, such as cross-group play and friendships, have been identified as particularly effective for promoting positive beliefs toward outgroup peers. Relations between children's cross-group play experiences and their beliefs about peers' math and science competencies and high-status occupational prospects have not yet been examined. Understanding these relations is important given that children from minoritized groups continue to face exclusion and bias in these domains. The present study examined the associations between children's (<i>N</i> = 983, <i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 9.64, <i>SD</i> <sub>age</sub> = .89) reported cross-group play experiences and their math and science competency beliefs and high-status occupation expectations about girls and Black peers. Results revealed that, for majority group participants (i.e., boys and White children), higher levels of cross-group play were associated with significantly higher beliefs and expectations for girls and Black peers. Further, results demonstrated contexts in which higher levels of cross-group play were positively associated with girls' and Black children's beliefs and expectations for their own groups. Together, these findings advance theory and research on the benefits of cross-group contact in childhood by highlighting novel outcomes to which cross-group contact is positively related, as well as by showing that children from both minoritized and majority status groups stand to benefit from cross-group contact.

Social DevelopmentVol. 34(1)
Boston College (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Career Development and Diversity
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.