Late Breaking Abstract - Symptom-based rehabilitation (REHAB) vs. usual care in people with post COVID-19 condition – the Reload trial: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)

<bold>Background:</bold> Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) is characterized by heterogeneous symptoms, impacting daily and quality life (QoL). Despite numerous isolated intervention studies, evidence from RCTs and comprehensive REHAB programs to support guidelines is missing. <bold>Objective:</bold> To investigate the effect of a symptom-based REHAB program compared with usual care on QoL in people with PCC. <bold>Methods:</bold> Participants were randomized to either usual care (control group, CG) or a comprehensive, multimodal 3-week inpatient REHAB program (intervention group, IG), with interventions tailored to improve fatigue, cognitive function or somatic symptoms, depending on the individual´s most significant symptom (<ext-link>NCT05172206</ext-link>). Primary outcome was change in QoL, measured by the SF-12 physical (PSS) & mental summary scale (MSS) from pre [T1] to post REHAB/usual care period [T2]. Change in QoL was also analyzed at a 3-month follow-up [T3] as a secondary measure. <bold>Results:</bold> Of 132 participants,102 completed the study (IG: n=47, 47±13y; CG: n=55, 48±11y; mild COVID-19 infection: IG 89%, CG 91%; unable to work due to PCC: IG 40.4%, CG 38%). Significant between-group differences existed in QoL change from T1 to T2 (PSS Δ2.9pts. 95%CI [0.26 to 5.51], p=0.031; MSS Δ6.53pts. 95%CI [2.62 to 10.51], p=0.001) in favor of the IG. At T3, between-group differences remained significant for PSS (Δ4.3pts. 95%CI [1.66 to 6.96], p=0.002) but not for MSS (Δ3.80pts. 95%CI [−0.15 to 7.76], p=0.059). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> This RCT demonstrates for the first time that a comprehensive and multimodal symptom-based REHAB program specific for PCC significantly improves QoL and is superior to natural recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.rct3722
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Late Breaking Abstract - Symptom-based rehabilitation (REHAB) vs. usual care in people with post COVID-19 condition – the Reload trial: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)

Andreas Rembert Koczulla, Clancy John Dennis, Bernhard Ulm, Tessa Schneeberger et al.
1 citations
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
0.37
article

Late Breaking Abstract - Symptom-based rehabilitation (REHAB) vs. usual care in people with post COVID-19 condition – the Reload trial: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)

Andreas Rembert Koczulla, Clancy John Dennis, Bernhard Ulm, Tessa Schneeberger, Rainer Gloeckl, Inga Jarosch, Daniela Leitl
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) is characterized by heterogeneous symptoms, impacting daily and quality life (QoL). Despite numerous isolated intervention studies, evidence from RCTs and comprehensive REHAB programs to support guidelines is missing. <bold>Objective:</bold> To investigate the effect of a symptom-based REHAB program compared with usual care on QoL in people with PCC. <bold>Methods:</bold> Participants were randomized to either usual care (control group, CG) or a comprehensive, multimodal 3-week inpatient REHAB program (intervention group, IG), with interventions tailored to improve fatigue, cognitive function or somatic symptoms, depending on the individual´s most significant symptom (<ext-link>NCT05172206</ext-link>). Primary outcome was change in QoL, measured by the SF-12 physical (PSS) & mental summary scale (MSS) from pre [T1] to post REHAB/usual care period [T2]. Change in QoL was also analyzed at a 3-month follow-up [T3] as a secondary measure. <bold>Results:</bold> Of 132 participants,102 completed the study (IG: n=47, 47±13y; CG: n=55, 48±11y; mild COVID-19 infection: IG 89%, CG 91%; unable to work due to PCC: IG 40.4%, CG 38%). Significant between-group differences existed in QoL change from T1 to T2 (PSS Δ2.9pts. 95%CI [0.26 to 5.51], p=0.031; MSS Δ6.53pts. 95%CI [2.62 to 10.51], p=0.001) in favor of the IG. At T3, between-group differences remained significant for PSS (Δ4.3pts. 95%CI [1.66 to 6.96], p=0.002) but not for MSS (Δ3.80pts. 95%CI [−0.15 to 7.76], p=0.059). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> This RCT demonstrates for the first time that a comprehensive and multimodal symptom-based REHAB program specific for PCC significantly improves QoL and is superior to natural recovery.

Statistisches Bundesamt (DE), Stanford Health Care (US), Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.