Assumption-based Design of Hybrid Diagnosis Systems

Hybrid diagnosis systems combine model-based and data-driven methods to leverage their respective strengths and mitigate individual weaknesses in fault diagnosis. This paper proposes a unified framework for analyzing and designing hybrid diagnosis systems, focusing on the principles underlying the computation of diagnoses from observations. The framework emphasizes the importance of assumptions about fault modes and their manifestations in the system. The proposed architecture supports both fault decoupling and classification techniques, allowing for the flexible integration of model-based residuals and data-driven classifiers. Comparative analysis highlights how classical model-based and pure data-driven systems are special cases within the proposed hybrid framework. The proposed framework emphasizes that the key factor in categorizing fault diagnosis methods is not whether they are model-based or data-driven, but rather their ability to decuple faults which is crucial for rejecting diagnoses when fault training data is limited. Future research directions are suggested to further enhance hybrid fault diagnosis systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Conference of the PHM Society
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2024.v16i1.4141
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assumption-based Design of Hybrid Diagnosis Systems

Daniel Jung, Mattias Krysander
1 citations
Annual Conference of the PHM Society
Fault Detection and Control Systems
0.68
article

Assumption-based Design of Hybrid Diagnosis Systems

Daniel Jung, Mattias Krysander
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Hybrid diagnosis systems combine model-based and data-driven methods to leverage their respective strengths and mitigate individual weaknesses in fault diagnosis. This paper proposes a unified framework for analyzing and designing hybrid diagnosis systems, focusing on the principles underlying the computation of diagnoses from observations. The framework emphasizes the importance of assumptions about fault modes and their manifestations in the system. The proposed architecture supports both fault decoupling and classification techniques, allowing for the flexible integration of model-based residuals and data-driven classifiers. Comparative analysis highlights how classical model-based and pure data-driven systems are special cases within the proposed hybrid framework. The proposed framework emphasizes that the key factor in categorizing fault diagnosis methods is not whether they are model-based or data-driven, but rather their ability to decuple faults which is crucial for rejecting diagnoses when fault training data is limited. Future research directions are suggested to further enhance hybrid fault diagnosis systems.

Annual Conference of the PHM SocietyVol. 16(1)
Linköping University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.