Treated and untreated cows housed side by side in tie-stalls and their respective risk of harboring E. coli resistant to antimicrobials

Parenteral antimicrobial treatment results in the excretion of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Dairy cows are commonly housed side by side in tie-stalls and often receive antimicrobial treatment. However, studies investigating treated cows as source of colonization of neighboring cows with resistant bacteria are scarce. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in cows (treated and untreated) in tie-stalls was investigated to assess their respective risks of carrying resistant bacteria. Furthermore, we analyzed associations of farm management with AMR. Case-control study: For isolation of indicator Escherichia (E.) coli, rectal swab samples were taken. Cows were sampled depending on treatment history and proximity to one another (cow A: recently treated parenterally; cow B: untreated, next to cow A; cow C: untreated, at considerable distance from all treated cows). Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by microdilution. Associations of AMR with exposure to cow A, treatments, and management were analyzed using generalized mixed-effects logistic models. Susceptibility data on 571 isolates from 131 dairy farms were obtained. Almost no difference in proportions of resistant E. coli was observed between cows B and C (B: 53.4%; C: 57.2%; P = 0.52). Untreated cows had lower odds of carrying resistant E. coli than treated cows (B: OR 0.44, P<0.001; C: OR 0.54, P = 0.007). Non-pansusceptibility of isolates was associated with antimicrobial treatment (1 treatment: OR 2.11, P = 0.001; ≥2: OR 1.76, P = 0.043). Using manure on forage crops was associated with higher odds of pansusceptibility (OR 2.01, P = 0.004). For daily practice, with regard to the risk of AMR transmission, results of this study do not provide evidence for the need to separate treated cows from others during treatment in tie-stalls.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310431
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treated and untreated cows housed side by side in tie-stalls and their respective risk of harboring E. coli resistant to antimicrobials

Véronique Bernier Gosselin, Jens Becker, Heike Kaspar, Belinda Köchle
3 citations
PLoS ONE
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
1.91
article

Treated and untreated cows housed side by side in tie-stalls and their respective risk of harboring E. coli resistant to antimicrobials

Véronique Bernier Gosselin, Jens Becker, Heike Kaspar, Belinda Köchle
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Parenteral antimicrobial treatment results in the excretion of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Dairy cows are commonly housed side by side in tie-stalls and often receive antimicrobial treatment. However, studies investigating treated cows as source of colonization of neighboring cows with resistant bacteria are scarce. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in cows (treated and untreated) in tie-stalls was investigated to assess their respective risks of carrying resistant bacteria. Furthermore, we analyzed associations of farm management with AMR. Case-control study: For isolation of indicator Escherichia (E.) coli, rectal swab samples were taken. Cows were sampled depending on treatment history and proximity to one another (cow A: recently treated parenterally; cow B: untreated, next to cow A; cow C: untreated, at considerable distance from all treated cows). Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by microdilution. Associations of AMR with exposure to cow A, treatments, and management were analyzed using generalized mixed-effects logistic models. Susceptibility data on 571 isolates from 131 dairy farms were obtained. Almost no difference in proportions of resistant E. coli was observed between cows B and C (B: 53.4%; C: 57.2%; P = 0.52). Untreated cows had lower odds of carrying resistant E. coli than treated cows (B: OR 0.44, P<0.001; C: OR 0.54, P = 0.007). Non-pansusceptibility of isolates was associated with antimicrobial treatment (1 treatment: OR 2.11, P = 0.001; ≥2: OR 1.76, P = 0.043). Using manure on forage crops was associated with higher odds of pansusceptibility (OR 2.01, P = 0.004). For daily practice, with regard to the risk of AMR transmission, results of this study do not provide evidence for the need to separate treated cows from others during treatment in tie-stalls.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(11)
University of Bern (CH), Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (DE)
Vontobel-Stiftung
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.