Recovery of bio-based volatile fatty acids from anaerobically treated winery wastewater using a closed-loop liquid-liquid hydrophobic membrane contactor system

• Performance of a hydrophobic liquid–liquid membrane contactor (MC). • Mass flux, mass transfer, and recovery efficiency. • Recovery of bio-VFAs from up flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) bioreactor treating winery wastewater. • Performance of electrochemical acidification cell to acidify pH. This research evaluated a closed-loop hydrophobic liquid–liquid membrane contactor (MC) for the recovery of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) from the effluent of an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) bioreactor treating winery wastewater. Sodium bicarbonate was used as a stripping solution for its operational flexibility and compatibility with downstream bioprocesses. An electrochemical acidification cell (EAC) was tested to continuously adjust of pH of the feed solution to avoid the use of inorganic acids. VFA recovery was optimized under different flow rates and feed pH conditions using a synthetic VFA solution and validated with actual UASB effluent. Lower feed pH resulted in higher VFA recovery due to increased protonation of the acids. This effect was more pronounced when using synthetic VFA solutions compared to real UASB effluent. Specifically, the MC system recovered 16 ± 5 % of acetic acid at 0.3 ± 0.1 gCOD/m 2 h flux and 34 ± 4 % of butyric acid at 0.5 ± 0.1 gCOD/m 2 h flux at an unadjusted UASB effluent feed pH of 4.9, compared to 22 ± 3 % at 0.5 ± 0.1 gCOD/m 2 h flux and 46 ± 5 % at 0.7 ± 0.1 gCOD/m 2 h flux, respectively, at pH 2. The EAC effectively lowered the feed pH of UASB effluent to 3.9, achieving acetic acid recovery of 22 ± 3 % at a mass flux of 0.2 ± 0.1 gCOD/m 2 h, and butyric acid recovery of 45 ± 1 % at a mass flux of 0.6 ± 0.1 gCOD/m 2 h. These moderate recovery efficiencies are likely influenced by the lower pH gradient resulting from the use of sodium bicarbonate. However, the compatibility of sodium bicarbonate with bioprocesses offers the advantage that the proposed UASB-MC system can be seamlessly integrated with downstream bioprocesses to produce valuable end products for other markets, such as PHA for plastics and microbial proteins for animal feed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering Journal
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.156889
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recovery of bio-based volatile fatty acids from anaerobically treated winery wastewater using a closed-loop liquid-liquid hydrophobic membrane contactor system

Riccardo Lo Coco, Nicola Frison, Eliisa Järvelä, Aleksandra Jelić
3 citations
Chemical Engineering Journal
Membrane Separation Technologies
0.60
article

Recovery of bio-based volatile fatty acids from anaerobically treated winery wastewater using a closed-loop liquid-liquid hydrophobic membrane contactor system

Riccardo Lo Coco, Nicola Frison, Eliisa Järvelä, Aleksandra Jelić
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Performance of a hydrophobic liquid–liquid membrane contactor (MC). • Mass flux, mass transfer, and recovery efficiency. • Recovery of bio-VFAs from up flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) bioreactor treating winery wastewater. • Performance of electrochemical acidification cell to acidify pH. This research evaluated a closed-loop hydrophobic liquid–liquid membrane contactor (MC) for the recovery of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) from the effluent of an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) bioreactor treating winery wastewater. Sodium bicarbonate was used as a stripping solution for its operational flexibility and compatibility with downstream bioprocesses. An electrochemical acidification cell (EAC) was tested to continuously adjust of pH of the feed solution to avoid the use of inorganic acids. VFA recovery was optimized under different flow rates and feed pH conditions using a synthetic VFA solution and validated with actual UASB effluent. Lower feed pH resulted in higher VFA recovery due to increased protonation of the acids. This effect was more pronounced when using synthetic VFA solutions compared to real UASB effluent. Specifically, the MC system recovered 16 ± 5 % of acetic acid at 0.3 ± 0.1 gCOD/m 2 h flux and 34 ± 4 % of butyric acid at 0.5 ± 0.1 gCOD/m 2 h flux at an unadjusted UASB effluent feed pH of 4.9, compared to 22 ± 3 % at 0.5 ± 0.1 gCOD/m 2 h flux and 46 ± 5 % at 0.7 ± 0.1 gCOD/m 2 h flux, respectively, at pH 2. The EAC effectively lowered the feed pH of UASB effluent to 3.9, achieving acetic acid recovery of 22 ± 3 % at a mass flux of 0.2 ± 0.1 gCOD/m 2 h, and butyric acid recovery of 45 ± 1 % at a mass flux of 0.6 ± 0.1 gCOD/m 2 h. These moderate recovery efficiencies are likely influenced by the lower pH gradient resulting from the use of sodium bicarbonate. However, the compatibility of sodium bicarbonate with bioprocesses offers the advantage that the proposed UASB-MC system can be seamlessly integrated with downstream bioprocesses to produce valuable end products for other markets, such as PHA for plastics and microbial proteins for animal feed.

Chemical Engineering JournalVol. 500
University of Verona (IT), VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Membrane Separation Technologies
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.