Robust and Adaptive Control of a Soft Continuum Manipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery

This article investigates the model-based control in configurations space of a soft continuum manipulator for minimally invasive surgery. The main control challenges for these types of systems are the presence of model uncertainties and nonlinearities. To this end, a sliding-mode controller, a Lyapunov redesign controller, and an adaptive controller have been designed and compared by means of simulations and experiments on a prototype. The results indicate that the adaptive controller yields better accuracy but a slower transient. Conversely, the sliding-mode controller and Lyapunov redesign yield a faster response but can result in chattering or steady-state errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Robotics
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics13110162
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Soft Robotics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust and Adaptive Control of a Soft Continuum Manipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery

Liujia Wang, Kaiwen Chen, Enrico Franco
4 citations
Robotics
Soft Robotics and Applications
0.74
article

Robust and Adaptive Control of a Soft Continuum Manipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery

Liujia Wang, Kaiwen Chen, Enrico Franco
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This article investigates the model-based control in configurations space of a soft continuum manipulator for minimally invasive surgery. The main control challenges for these types of systems are the presence of model uncertainties and nonlinearities. To this end, a sliding-mode controller, a Lyapunov redesign controller, and an adaptive controller have been designed and compared by means of simulations and experiments on a prototype. The results indicate that the adaptive controller yields better accuracy but a slower transient. Conversely, the sliding-mode controller and Lyapunov redesign yield a faster response but can result in chattering or steady-state errors.

RoboticsVol. 13(11)
Imperial College London (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Soft Robotics and Applications
0.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.