Multifactor models of creativity: structural and dynamic approaches in psychological assessment

Introduction . The article addresses the problem of diagnosing creativity as a complex and multifactor construct. Aim. The present article aimed to examine multifactor models of creativity and to reveal the structural and dynamic aspects of psychological assessment in order to identify relevant, less developed aspects of the psychological assessment of creativity. Methodology and research methods. Multifactor models of creativity were reviewed. A matrix of creativity research in different branches of psychology was modified and a matrix of methods for assessing different aspects of creativity was developed. Results and scientific novelty. The analysis of multifactor models of creativity (4P, 4C, 5A, 7C) identified five general structural factors of creativity (5T): creative person, creative process, creative product, creative environment, and co-creation . The 5T×4C matrix for creativity diagnostic methods, which includes structural (5T) and dynamic parameters (4C), was formed. Research areas with less developed tools of psychological assessment were identified: the creative process at the pro-C and big-C level; the creative environment at the mini-C level; and co-creation at all levels of creativity. Practical significance. The proposed 5T×4C matrix serves as the foundation for analysing the current aspects of creativity diagnostics development. The analysis of multifactor models and psychological assessment methods for creativity can be utilised in developing new approaches to studying the phenomenon of creativity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Education and science journal
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-9-129-150
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multifactor models of creativity: structural and dynamic approaches in psychological assessment

Naboychenko E.S., V. G. Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya, V.A. Glukhova, Светлана Коробова et al.
2 citations
The Education and science journal
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
1.02
article

Multifactor models of creativity: structural and dynamic approaches in psychological assessment

Naboychenko E.S., V. G. Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya, V.A. Glukhova, Светлана Коробова, E. I. Koltunov
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction . The article addresses the problem of diagnosing creativity as a complex and multifactor construct. Aim. The present article aimed to examine multifactor models of creativity and to reveal the structural and dynamic aspects of psychological assessment in order to identify relevant, less developed aspects of the psychological assessment of creativity. Methodology and research methods. Multifactor models of creativity were reviewed. A matrix of creativity research in different branches of psychology was modified and a matrix of methods for assessing different aspects of creativity was developed. Results and scientific novelty. The analysis of multifactor models of creativity (4P, 4C, 5A, 7C) identified five general structural factors of creativity (5T): creative person, creative process, creative product, creative environment, and co-creation . The 5T×4C matrix for creativity diagnostic methods, which includes structural (5T) and dynamic parameters (4C), was formed. Research areas with less developed tools of psychological assessment were identified: the creative process at the pro-C and big-C level; the creative environment at the mini-C level; and co-creation at all levels of creativity. Practical significance. The proposed 5T×4C matrix serves as the foundation for analysing the current aspects of creativity diagnostics development. The analysis of multifactor models and psychological assessment methods for creativity can be utilised in developing new approaches to studying the phenomenon of creativity.

The Education and science journalVol. 26(9)
South Ural State University (RU), Ural State Medical University (RU)
Russian Science Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
1.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.