Progress in Carbon Cathodic Host Matrices for Lithium–Sulfur Cells: A Meta Analysis

The development of cathodes for lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries requires optimizing a variety of interacting and competing variables, with the early technology readiness level (TRL) of Li–S relative to Li-ion batteries presenting researchers with a wide parameter space. Given the interactions between the positive electrode design and the electrolyte, the development of Li–S electrodes requires comprehensive reporting of parameters to enable a comparison of developments. By developing a tool to aggregate synthesis parameters with cell performance, we summarize the frequency with which different components and electrochemical testing conditions are used, including data from 100 articles. Grouping reported capacity data by composite carbon type, C rate, and sulfur content revealed widespread variation in the maximum capacity and rate of degradation. We hope that the tool developed here will provide a facile workflow and promote consistent reporting across the literature, while also pointing toward routes to improve the design of Li–S positive electrodes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Materials Letters
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c01646
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Progress in Carbon Cathodic Host Matrices for Lithium–Sulfur Cells: A Meta Analysis

James B. Robinson, Paul Robert Shearing, Liam Bird
6 citations
ACS Materials Letters
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
1.25
article

Progress in Carbon Cathodic Host Matrices for Lithium–Sulfur Cells: A Meta Analysis

James B. Robinson, Paul Robert Shearing, Liam Bird
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The development of cathodes for lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries requires optimizing a variety of interacting and competing variables, with the early technology readiness level (TRL) of Li–S relative to Li-ion batteries presenting researchers with a wide parameter space. Given the interactions between the positive electrode design and the electrolyte, the development of Li–S electrodes requires comprehensive reporting of parameters to enable a comparison of developments. By developing a tool to aggregate synthesis parameters with cell performance, we summarize the frequency with which different components and electrochemical testing conditions are used, including data from 100 articles. Grouping reported capacity data by composite carbon type, C rate, and sulfur content revealed widespread variation in the maximum capacity and rate of degradation. We hope that the tool developed here will provide a facile workflow and promote consistent reporting across the literature, while also pointing toward routes to improve the design of Li–S positive electrodes.

ACS Materials LettersVol. 6(12)
University of Oxford (GB), Advanced Propulsion Centre (GB), The Faraday Institution (GB), University College London (GB)
Faraday Institution, Royal Academy of Engineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
1.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.