Management of portal vein thrombosis in candidates for liver transplant

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent event among patients with advanced liver disease, with a prevalence reaching up to 26% in those awaiting liver transplantation (LT). Extensive thrombosis affecting the mesenteric vein confluence correlates with increased morbidity and mortality post-LT, particularly when it impedes physiological anastomosis or contraindicates the LT. Current guidelines advocate for routine PVT screening in all potential liver transplant candidates and prompt treatment upon detection. The main objective of candidates for LT is to facilitate physiological portal-to-portal anastomosis. Anticoagulation serves as the first-line therapy, achieving recanalization rates between 33% and 75%. Discontinuation of anticoagulation significantly heightens the risk of rethrombosis in a substantial proportion of patients; therefore, it is recommended to continue anticoagulation until LT for those awaiting LT or potential candidates for LT. Nevertheless, 30%-60% of patients fail to respond to anticoagulation, with PVT progression occurring in up to 14% despite anticoagulation. In such cases, TIPS placement emerges as a viable alternative to maintain portal vein patency. While the feasibility of TIPS placement diminished with the presence of portal cavernoma or chronic PVT, the introduction of novel interventional radiological techniques to recanalize the portal venous axis through transplenic, transmesenteric, and/or transhepatic routes is revolutionizing this landscape. These advancements achieve TIPS placement and recanalization in 90%-100% of patients, warranting consideration in patients with cirrhosis with chronic PVT for whom LT would otherwise be contraindicated or when physiological anastomosis is not feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liver Transplantation
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/lvt.0000000000000531
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management of portal vein thrombosis in candidates for liver transplant

Juan Carlos García‐Pagán, Fanny Turón, Sarah Shalaby, Virginia Hernández–Gea
4 citations
Liver Transplantation
Liver Disease and Transplantation
1.48
article

Management of portal vein thrombosis in candidates for liver transplant

Juan Carlos García‐Pagán, Fanny Turón, Sarah Shalaby, Virginia Hernández–Gea
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent event among patients with advanced liver disease, with a prevalence reaching up to 26% in those awaiting liver transplantation (LT). Extensive thrombosis affecting the mesenteric vein confluence correlates with increased morbidity and mortality post-LT, particularly when it impedes physiological anastomosis or contraindicates the LT. Current guidelines advocate for routine PVT screening in all potential liver transplant candidates and prompt treatment upon detection. The main objective of candidates for LT is to facilitate physiological portal-to-portal anastomosis. Anticoagulation serves as the first-line therapy, achieving recanalization rates between 33% and 75%. Discontinuation of anticoagulation significantly heightens the risk of rethrombosis in a substantial proportion of patients; therefore, it is recommended to continue anticoagulation until LT for those awaiting LT or potential candidates for LT. Nevertheless, 30%-60% of patients fail to respond to anticoagulation, with PVT progression occurring in up to 14% despite anticoagulation. In such cases, TIPS placement emerges as a viable alternative to maintain portal vein patency. While the feasibility of TIPS placement diminished with the presence of portal cavernoma or chronic PVT, the introduction of novel interventional radiological techniques to recanalize the portal venous axis through transplenic, transmesenteric, and/or transhepatic routes is revolutionizing this landscape. These advancements achieve TIPS placement and recanalization in 90%-100% of patients, warranting consideration in patients with cirrhosis with chronic PVT for whom LT would otherwise be contraindicated or when physiological anastomosis is not feasible.

Liver TransplantationVol. 31(12)
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (ES), Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (ES), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), Fundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona-Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
1.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.