Discussion of “Thermal conductivity of porous building materials: An exploration of new challenges in fractal modelling solutions”

In November 2023 this journal published “Thermal conductivity of porous building ma­terials: An exploration of new challenges in fractal modelling solutions”. That paper gauges four fractal building materials’ thermal conductivity models, concluding that fractal-geometry-based approa­ches appear “a promising method” as they “demonstra­te high reliability in repro­ducing experimental data”. This discussion of the pa­per aims to shine a different light on the potential of fractal thermal conductivity models. It shows that good agreement with experimental data usually ori­ginates from calibration of various “physical” factors comprised in these models, with the fitted numbers commonly deviating from physical rea­lity. Moreover, exemplary instances reveal that good agreement with experimental data is obtained des­pite misinterpretation of measured outcomes or critical defects in model development, or, exceptio­nally, due to fabrication of validation information. This discussion does hence not share the pa­per’s positive opinion on the prospects of fractal-geometry-ba­sed ther­­mal conductivity models, and advises caution instead.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RILEM Technical Letters
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2024.199
Primary Topic
Hygrothermal properties of building materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discussion of “Thermal conductivity of porous building materials: An exploration of new challenges in fractal modelling solutions”

Hans Janßen
RILEM Technical Letters
Hygrothermal properties of building materials
article

Discussion of “Thermal conductivity of porous building materials: An exploration of new challenges in fractal modelling solutions”

Hans Janßen
article en

Abstract

In November 2023 this journal published “Thermal conductivity of porous building ma­terials: An exploration of new challenges in fractal modelling solutions”. That paper gauges four fractal building materials’ thermal conductivity models, concluding that fractal-geometry-based approa­ches appear “a promising method” as they “demonstra­te high reliability in repro­ducing experimental data”. This discussion of the pa­per aims to shine a different light on the potential of fractal thermal conductivity models. It shows that good agreement with experimental data usually ori­ginates from calibration of various “physical” factors comprised in these models, with the fitted numbers commonly deviating from physical rea­lity. Moreover, exemplary instances reveal that good agreement with experimental data is obtained des­pite misinterpretation of measured outcomes or critical defects in model development, or, exceptio­nally, due to fabrication of validation information. This discussion does hence not share the pa­per’s positive opinion on the prospects of fractal-geometry-ba­sed ther­­mal conductivity models, and advises caution instead.

RILEM Technical LettersVol. 9
Sustainable Energy Systems (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Hygrothermal properties of building materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.