Platelet-Function-Monitoring-Guided Therapy After Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Antiplatelet therapy after emergent carotid stenting (eCAS) represents a challenge in balancing the risk of intracerebral hemorrhages (ICHs) and in-stent thrombosis (IST). Post-procedural platelet function monitoring may guide antiplatelet therapy and could potentially improve outcomes due to fewer post-procedural complications. <b>Methods:</b> Consecutive eCAS patients (2019-2021) were included in a single-center retrospective observational study. Patients treated with eCAS received peri-procedural eptifibatide followed by dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. The effect of platelet ADP inhibition by clopidogrel was monitored using the Multiplate<sup>®</sup> Analyzer (Roche). Clopidogrel non-responders were changed to ticagrelor treatment. The primary outcome was defined as a favorable outcome at 90 days using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-2 versus 3-6. Safety outcomes included ICH, IST, and mortality. Data were analyzed and compared in clopidogrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients using Fischer's exact test and multivariate logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> A total of 105 patients had eCAS, and 28 patients (27%) were clopidogrel non-responders and were changed to treatment with ticagrelor. The favorable outcome was more frequent in ticagrelor-treated patients, 23 (82%), than in clopidogrel-treated patients, 44 (57%), <i>p</i> = 0.036. Numerically, ICH, IST, and mortality were more frequent in clopidogrel-treated patients, but none of the differences were statistically significant. In multivariate analyses, ticagrelor treatment was significantly associated with the favorable outcome, OR = 3.89 (95% CI: 1.09-13.86), <i>p</i> = 0.036. <b>Conclusions:</b> One in four eCAS patients were clopidogrel non-responders. This study suggests that personalized antiplatelet treatment therapy was safe, and that changing treatment to ticagrelor in clopidogrel non-responders was associated with better outcomes in eCAS patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226690
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Platelet-Function-Monitoring-Guided Therapy After Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting

Joan Højgaard, Nicolaj Grønbæk Laugesen, Trine Stavngaard, Thomas Truelsen et al.
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
1.26
article

Platelet-Function-Monitoring-Guided Therapy After Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting

Joan Højgaard, Nicolaj Grønbæk Laugesen, Trine Stavngaard, Thomas Truelsen, Andreas Hjelm Brandt, Magnus Peter Brammer Kreiberg
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Antiplatelet therapy after emergent carotid stenting (eCAS) represents a challenge in balancing the risk of intracerebral hemorrhages (ICHs) and in-stent thrombosis (IST). Post-procedural platelet function monitoring may guide antiplatelet therapy and could potentially improve outcomes due to fewer post-procedural complications. <b>Methods:</b> Consecutive eCAS patients (2019-2021) were included in a single-center retrospective observational study. Patients treated with eCAS received peri-procedural eptifibatide followed by dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. The effect of platelet ADP inhibition by clopidogrel was monitored using the Multiplate<sup>®</sup> Analyzer (Roche). Clopidogrel non-responders were changed to ticagrelor treatment. The primary outcome was defined as a favorable outcome at 90 days using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-2 versus 3-6. Safety outcomes included ICH, IST, and mortality. Data were analyzed and compared in clopidogrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients using Fischer's exact test and multivariate logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> A total of 105 patients had eCAS, and 28 patients (27%) were clopidogrel non-responders and were changed to treatment with ticagrelor. The favorable outcome was more frequent in ticagrelor-treated patients, 23 (82%), than in clopidogrel-treated patients, 44 (57%), <i>p</i> = 0.036. Numerically, ICH, IST, and mortality were more frequent in clopidogrel-treated patients, but none of the differences were statistically significant. In multivariate analyses, ticagrelor treatment was significantly associated with the favorable outcome, OR = 3.89 (95% CI: 1.09-13.86), <i>p</i> = 0.036. <b>Conclusions:</b> One in four eCAS patients were clopidogrel non-responders. This study suggests that personalized antiplatelet treatment therapy was safe, and that changing treatment to ticagrelor in clopidogrel non-responders was associated with better outcomes in eCAS patients.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(22)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK)
Rigshospitalet, Novo Nordisk Fonden
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.