Optimum Planning of Carbon Capture and Storage Network Using Goal Programming

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a critical technology used for mitigating climate change by capturing carbon dioxide emissions from industrial sources and storing them underground to prevent their release into the atmosphere. Despite its potential, optimizing CCS systems for cost-effectiveness and efficiency improvement remains a significant challenge. In this paper, the optimization of CCS systems through the development and application of two mathematical optimization techniques is introduced. The first technique is based on using a superstructure optimization model, while the second technique relies on applying a goal programming optimization model. These models were solved using LINGO software version API 14.0.5099.166 to enhance the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of CCS systems. The first model, seeking to maximize the exchange of CO2 flowrate from sources to sinks, achieved a CO2 capture rate of 93.36% with an annual total cost of USD 1.175 billion. The second model introduced a novel mixed-integer non-linear programming (MINLP) approach for multi-objective optimization, targeting the minimization of total system cost, alternative storage, and unutilized storage while maximizing CO2 load exchange. The application of the second model, when prioritized to maximize CO2 flowrate exchange using the goal programming technique, resulted in a cost reduction of 36.46% and a CO2 capture rate of 75.87%. In contrast, when the second model prioritized minimizing the total annual cost, a 48% cost reduction was achieved, and the CO2 capture rate was decreased by 68.37%. A comparison of the two models’ results is presented. The results showed that the second model, with the priority of maximizing CO2 capture, provides the best economic–environmental objective balance, which offers notable cost reductions while keeping an efficient CO2 capture rate. This study highlights the potential of advanced mathematical modeling in increasing the feasibility of CCS as one of the very important strategies of mitigating climate change and reducing global warming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112463
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Process Optimization and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimum Planning of Carbon Capture and Storage Network Using Goal Programming

Walaa Mahmoud Shehata, Abeer M. Shoaib, Fatma Ayyad, Abdelrahman G. Gadallah et al.
4 citations
Processes
Process Optimization and Integration
1.31
article

Optimum Planning of Carbon Capture and Storage Network Using Goal Programming

Walaa Mahmoud Shehata, Abeer M. Shoaib, Fatma Ayyad, Abdelrahman G. Gadallah, Ahmed A. Bhran
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a critical technology used for mitigating climate change by capturing carbon dioxide emissions from industrial sources and storing them underground to prevent their release into the atmosphere. Despite its potential, optimizing CCS systems for cost-effectiveness and efficiency improvement remains a significant challenge. In this paper, the optimization of CCS systems through the development and application of two mathematical optimization techniques is introduced. The first technique is based on using a superstructure optimization model, while the second technique relies on applying a goal programming optimization model. These models were solved using LINGO software version API 14.0.5099.166 to enhance the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of CCS systems. The first model, seeking to maximize the exchange of CO2 flowrate from sources to sinks, achieved a CO2 capture rate of 93.36% with an annual total cost of USD 1.175 billion. The second model introduced a novel mixed-integer non-linear programming (MINLP) approach for multi-objective optimization, targeting the minimization of total system cost, alternative storage, and unutilized storage while maximizing CO2 load exchange. The application of the second model, when prioritized to maximize CO2 flowrate exchange using the goal programming technique, resulted in a cost reduction of 36.46% and a CO2 capture rate of 75.87%. In contrast, when the second model prioritized minimizing the total annual cost, a 48% cost reduction was achieved, and the CO2 capture rate was decreased by 68.37%. A comparison of the two models’ results is presented. The results showed that the second model, with the priority of maximizing CO2 capture, provides the best economic–environmental objective balance, which offers notable cost reductions while keeping an efficient CO2 capture rate. This study highlights the potential of advanced mathematical modeling in increasing the feasibility of CCS as one of the very important strategies of mitigating climate change and reducing global warming.

ProcessesVol. 12(11)
Suez University (EG), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), National Water Research Center (EG)
Imam Mohammed Ibn Saud Islamic University, Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Process Optimization and Integration
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.