Comparative analysis of treatment protocols and clinical outcomes in the management of acute urticaria and angioedema in the emergency department

Objective: The purpose of the study was to identify clinical differences in patients with acute urticaria and/or angioedema receiving various treatment regimes in the emergency department of Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. Particularly, it compared modern antihistamine therapy with corticosteroids as an analogue to routine antihistamines with regard to the rate of symptom improvement, relapse, and hospitalisation. Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study involving 542 patients with acute urticaria and/or angioedema. Patients were categorised into two groups: Group A, receiving a combination of antihistamines and corticosteroids (280); and Group B, receiving only antihistamines (262). Thus, the primary end points considered include time to resolution of symptoms, recurrence within 48 hours, and hospitalisation need. Data was analysed using the statistical package of social sciences (SPSS), while a p-value of < 0.05 formed the basis of significance. Results: The overall improvement time for symptoms was 3.6 hours in Group A and 5.1 hours in Group B (p < 0.001). The rates of recurrence were also lower in Group A (15%) than in Group B (29.8%, p < 0.01). Meanwhile, patients who were in Group A had 10% that needed inpatient admission as an intervention compared to 19.1% in Group B; p < 0.05. Side effects were few and were comparable between the two groups; therefore, patients in both groups had reactions such as drowsiness and gastrointestinal disturbances. Conclusion: Together, antihistamines plus corticosteroids were superior to antihistamines only in the treatment of acute urticarial and angioedema in patients in the emergency department. Patients reported symptoms resolved sooner, the rate of relapse was shorter, and hospitalisation was reduced. Based on this observation, corticosteroids should be considered as part of the usual care of patients presenting with moderate to severe symptoms in the emergency department. Future research should aim at sorting out various recommendations of treatment value for the purpose of achieving even better results of the therapy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.2.3285
Primary Topic
Urticaria and Related Conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of treatment protocols and clinical outcomes in the management of acute urticaria and angioedema in the emergency department

Rafi Ullah, Saadia Jabeen, Mir Ali, Salman Hayat et al.
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
Urticaria and Related Conditions
article

Comparative analysis of treatment protocols and clinical outcomes in the management of acute urticaria and angioedema in the emergency department

Rafi Ullah, Saadia Jabeen, Mir Ali, Salman Hayat, Haleema Khan, Aminur Rahman, Muhammad Zeeshan Khan, Sundas Safdar, N. Ayub, Muhammad Youas, Aibad Ahmed Afridi, Fatima Tu Zuhra
article en

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the study was to identify clinical differences in patients with acute urticaria and/or angioedema receiving various treatment regimes in the emergency department of Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. Particularly, it compared modern antihistamine therapy with corticosteroids as an analogue to routine antihistamines with regard to the rate of symptom improvement, relapse, and hospitalisation. Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study involving 542 patients with acute urticaria and/or angioedema. Patients were categorised into two groups: Group A, receiving a combination of antihistamines and corticosteroids (280); and Group B, receiving only antihistamines (262). Thus, the primary end points considered include time to resolution of symptoms, recurrence within 48 hours, and hospitalisation need. Data was analysed using the statistical package of social sciences (SPSS), while a p-value of < 0.05 formed the basis of significance. Results: The overall improvement time for symptoms was 3.6 hours in Group A and 5.1 hours in Group B (p < 0.001). The rates of recurrence were also lower in Group A (15%) than in Group B (29.8%, p < 0.01). Meanwhile, patients who were in Group A had 10% that needed inpatient admission as an intervention compared to 19.1% in Group B; p < 0.05. Side effects were few and were comparable between the two groups; therefore, patients in both groups had reactions such as drowsiness and gastrointestinal disturbances. Conclusion: Together, antihistamines plus corticosteroids were superior to antihistamines only in the treatment of acute urticarial and angioedema in patients in the emergency department. Patients reported symptoms resolved sooner, the rate of relapse was shorter, and hospitalisation was reduced. Based on this observation, corticosteroids should be considered as part of the usual care of patients presenting with moderate to severe symptoms in the emergency department. Future research should aim at sorting out various recommendations of treatment value for the purpose of achieving even better results of the therapy.

World Journal of Advanced Research and ReviewsVol. 24(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Urticaria and Related Conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.