Ability and knowledge: from epistemic transition systems to labelled stit models

It is possible to know that one can guarantee a certain result and yet not know how to guarantee it. In such cases one has the ability to guarantee something in a causal sense, but not in an epistemic sense. In this paper we focus on two formalisms used to model both conceptions of ability: one formalism based on epistemic transition systems and the other on labelled stit models. We show a strong correspondence between the two formalisms by providing mappings from the former to the latter for both the languages and the structures. Moreover, we demonstrate that our extension of labelled stit logic is more expressive than the logic of epistemic transition systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-024-09661-w
Primary Topic
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ability and knowledge: from epistemic transition systems to labelled stit models

Jan Broersen, Hein Duijf, Alexandra Kuncová, Aldo Iván Ramírez Abarca
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
article

Ability and knowledge: from epistemic transition systems to labelled stit models

Jan Broersen, Hein Duijf, Alexandra Kuncová, Aldo Iván Ramírez Abarca
article en

Abstract

It is possible to know that one can guarantee a certain result and yet not know how to guarantee it. In such cases one has the ability to guarantee something in a causal sense, but not in an epistemic sense. In this paper we focus on two formalisms used to model both conceptions of ability: one formalism based on epistemic transition systems and the other on labelled stit models. We show a strong correspondence between the two formalisms by providing mappings from the former to the latter for both the languages and the structures. Moreover, we demonstrate that our extension of labelled stit logic is more expressive than the logic of epistemic transition systems.

Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent SystemsVol. 39(1)
Utrecht University (NL), Munich School of Philosophy (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, European Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.