A randomized clinical trial comparing visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to Pocket Colposcopy for the triage of HPV+ women living with HIV in Kisumu, Kenya

Abstract Objective The World Health Organization recommends a “screen, triage, treat” approach for cervical cancer screening for Women Living with HIV (WLWH) in resource-limited settings, with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing preferred for screening. We assessed the use of the Pocket colposcope as an adjunct tool to Visual Assessment with Acetic Acid (VIA) for the triage of HPV+ WLWH. Methods We carried out a randomized clinical trial across six clinics in Kisumu, Kenya between November 2022 and April 2023 ( NCT04998318 ). WLWH who screened positive with self-collected HPV were randomized to either the VIA or Pocket arm. Exam positivity was determined by presence or absence of aceto-white epithelium (AWE). Directed biopsies were performed on AWE; if negative, two random biopsies were taken. Pathology was used to determine diagnostic accuracy. Providers and participants took brief surveys after each exam. Findings The rate of a positive exams was 17.3% for VIA compared to 14.3% for the Pocket. The overall rate of CIN2/3 was 15.4%, with 12.2% in the VIA Arm and is 18.8% in the Pocket Arm. Pocket and VIA performed comparably on all sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value (NPV). For Pocket compared to VIA, Sensitivity was 26.3% vs 25.0%; specificity was 88.9% vs 84.0%; and NPV was 82.9% vs 87.1%. However, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the Pocket colposcope arm was almost a factor of two higher than that of the VIA arm (Pocket arm PPV was 375 is and that of the VIA arm was 20.6%). The Pocket Colposcope was acceptable to providers and patients for clinic-based triage of HPV positivity. Conclusion Provider assessment with the Pocket colposcope detected significantly more treatable disease, thereby reducing the need for overtreatment. This study indicates that the Pocket colposcope is a feasible, lower cost colposcopic device, which could facilitate biopsy-confirmation of disease, increase provider training, patient education and facilitate remote diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-026-03609-5
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A randomized clinical trial comparing visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to Pocket Colposcopy for the triage of HPV+ women living with HIV in Kisumu, Kenya

Mary Elizabeth Dotson, Jeniffer Ambaka, Nirmala Ramanujam, Megan J. Huchko et al.
2 links
British Journal of Cancer
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

A randomized clinical trial comparing visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to Pocket Colposcopy for the triage of HPV+ women living with HIV in Kisumu, Kenya

Mary Elizabeth Dotson, Jeniffer Ambaka, Nirmala Ramanujam, Megan J. Huchko, Maria Cardoso dos Santos
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective The World Health Organization recommends a “screen, triage, treat” approach for cervical cancer screening for Women Living with HIV (WLWH) in resource-limited settings, with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing preferred for screening. We assessed the use of the Pocket colposcope as an adjunct tool to Visual Assessment with Acetic Acid (VIA) for the triage of HPV+ WLWH. Methods We carried out a randomized clinical trial across six clinics in Kisumu, Kenya between November 2022 and April 2023 ( NCT04998318 ). WLWH who screened positive with self-collected HPV were randomized to either the VIA or Pocket arm. Exam positivity was determined by presence or absence of aceto-white epithelium (AWE). Directed biopsies were performed on AWE; if negative, two random biopsies were taken. Pathology was used to determine diagnostic accuracy. Providers and participants took brief surveys after each exam. Findings The rate of a positive exams was 17.3% for VIA compared to 14.3% for the Pocket. The overall rate of CIN2/3 was 15.4%, with 12.2% in the VIA Arm and is 18.8% in the Pocket Arm. Pocket and VIA performed comparably on all sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value (NPV). For Pocket compared to VIA, Sensitivity was 26.3% vs 25.0%; specificity was 88.9% vs 84.0%; and NPV was 82.9% vs 87.1%. However, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the Pocket colposcope arm was almost a factor of two higher than that of the VIA arm (Pocket arm PPV was 375 is and that of the VIA arm was 20.6%). The Pocket Colposcope was acceptable to providers and patients for clinic-based triage of HPV positivity. Conclusion Provider assessment with the Pocket colposcope detected significantly more treatable disease, thereby reducing the need for overtreatment. This study indicates that the Pocket colposcope is a feasible, lower cost colposcopic device, which could facilitate biopsy-confirmation of disease, increase provider training, patient education and facilitate remote diagnosis.

British Journal of Cancer
Duke University (US), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon